jmw
Industrial
- Jun 27, 2001
- 7,435
Well, normally it's snake oil time when anyone talks about using electric charges/magnets etc to improve fuel efficiency, but when it comes to viscosity reduction, a US Department of Energy Test seems to show a significant temporary reduction in crude oil viscosity using the STWA device
As I recall, the use of "Snot" to reduce pipeline friction is an expensive solution and the Snot (drag reducer) tends to be broken down by the action of pumps etc so that after a distance along the pipeline it loses effectiveness.
In this device a seeming 50% viscosity reduction is feasible where the crude passes through some charged screens which align the particulate matter reducing internal friction.
OK, a couple of questions occur:
how much pressure drop does the device add the the flow - be ironic if it took most of the pressure drop achieved by viscosity reduction - and how far down the pipeline before the particulates are all over the shop again?
From the test reports power was reduced significantly so I guess that answers the first part of my question.
But how temporary is temporary?
According to the reports:
Anyone been involved with these tests or with the device?
Did I miss something here?
JMW
As I recall, the use of "Snot" to reduce pipeline friction is an expensive solution and the Snot (drag reducer) tends to be broken down by the action of pumps etc so that after a distance along the pipeline it loses effectiveness.
In this device a seeming 50% viscosity reduction is feasible where the crude passes through some charged screens which align the particulate matter reducing internal friction.
OK, a couple of questions occur:
how much pressure drop does the device add the the flow - be ironic if it took most of the pressure drop achieved by viscosity reduction - and how far down the pipeline before the particulates are all over the shop again?
From the test reports power was reduced significantly so I guess that answers the first part of my question.
But how temporary is temporary?
According to the reports:
This seems quite promising.When the AOT was disengaged, viscosity and pressure were observed to revert slowly back to baseline, returning to baseline values after approximately 11hours before the temperature viscosity reduction effect supplanted the AOT viscosity reduction effect.
Anyone been involved with these tests or with the device?
Did I miss something here?
JMW