Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Economizer Classification - Sec I or Sec VIII

Status
Not open for further replies.

RobsVette

Mechanical
Apr 15, 2009
94
Hey guys, I'm looking for some help in understanding the proper classification to be used with different pieces of equipment and why the different classifications are used.

First, I will explain the situation we are working with and then give my understanding of how this should be done.

Our company has been given a project to take two existing boilers that share a common economizer and install two new economizers, one for each boiler. The boilers are old B&W water tubes producing 120,000 #/hr of 150 psig saturated steam.

The company we are purchasing the economizers from is saying that they can build and certify the economizers to Sec VIII as opposed to Sec I. The point of doing this, is that Sec VIII allows the use of compression style tube connections and section I does not. They are stating that as long as the economizer is placed outside the Sec. I boundary everything is fine. Access to the area where the boilers are is the driving force here. We will be purchasing the economizers in Knock Down configuration and assembling on site, since there is no access to rig them in.

In principle, I disagree with this, however we have seen some weird exceptions to this rule in the past.

The reason for my disagreement with this, is that since an economizer is a device for heating water that is fueled by flue gasses from a burner, it should be constructed to the rules of Sec I. This would be consistent with most of the installations we have seen. Our company has assembled many large 3 pressure HRSGs and all of the economizers on these boilers fall into Sec. I, the same goes for small cogen units that produce 150 psi saturated steam. We have also done some High Temp Water heater installations and again all these items are fired with a burner and are constructed to the rules of Sec I.

The exception to this is that we have done some small fire tube boilers that produce 150 psi steam and are operated using waste heat from a recip engine (really no different than using waste heat from a gas turbine,) and these are classified as Sec VIII vessels with a form U-1 data report.

Can someone please explain the intention of when you should classifiy a water heater / boiler to each section of the code and if there is any intuitive reason as to why, please state that. (example would be for B31.1 the requirements are intended for high pressure, high temp systems as opposed to B31.3 where you could have high pressure mod temp or B31.9 which would be just water at low temp and low press)

If any other information is needed please let me know and I will provide it.

Thanks,
Rob

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Are these economizers mentioned above isolable per Section I (2010/2011a)?
 
As a follow-up to the above, look at the following Code Case

CC 1855-1
review U-1 (h) in ASME Section VIII, Div 1
review the Preamble in Section I.

With the above said, CC 1855-1 permits an enconomizer fabricated under Section VIII, Div 1 installed in a component designed and built to Section I provided the requirements of Section I are met as stated in the CC.

As a side note, SG General Requirements under BPVI has recently formed a task group to look into further defining the requirements for economizers for Section I.

 
Yes they will be isolatable. As a matter of good design, they will be able to be able to be bypassed. We dont want to have a problem with the economizer take down the whole boiler system. Given this, the economizer is supplied with its own relief valve to prevent any over pressurization from water being trapped in the economizer and being heated by the boiler flue.
 
Ok. See CC 1855-1. Yes, you can build this to Section VIII, Div 1 and install it in a Section I boiler.
 
Metengr,

I just got a copy of the code case 1855-1 from ASME.

One final question is as follows;

- Can you please further define the term "fired" as it relates to the difference between Sec I and Sec VIII div I?

Is a boiler economizer unfired or fired? I would say fired, because it is heated with the flue / exhaust gas from a burner or as a byproduct of combustion equipment. My personal feeling, an example of an unfired steam boiler would be the clean steam generators used in hospital laboratories. This device uses a hot process fluid (steam from a utility or central plant) and generates steam to be used for sterilization and other hospital functions. That would be an unfired steam boiler in my mind.

Thanks again for your assistance.

Rob
 
RobsVette;
As a member of BPV I standards committee we are struggling with the same concept. Until the task group comes up with revisions to identify the economizer under the specific scope of Section I, you have the following - an isolable economizer can be built to either Section I or VIII, Div 1 per the Code Case.
 
Ok thanks very much for your input. I wish you the best of luck in resolving this issue. It does seem to be pretty confusing.

Rob
 
sec VIII offers some other advantages in some cases: for example you can use stainless steel tubes in the sec VIII economizer, if needed for corrosion issues, but either you must avoid all chloride in the feedwater or must ensure zero steaming potential
 
Why would you need to avoidn chlorides in the feedwater? That could definately be a concern here because they do not follow a very good water treatment plan as far as I know. What would steaming potential affect the stainless steel?

Chemistry is not my strong point.
 
re: chlorides:

chloride strss corrosion is an issue for high carbon stainless steels. If you use a low carbon SS or a stabilized SS then the chlorides might not be an issue, espescially if the economizer does not steam.

If the economizer does steam, then the concentration of chlorides rises to high levels at the steam-water interface.

The 2 issues that asme sect I seems to address by barring use of SS on any water-wetted componetn within the setting is chloride stress corrsoion cracking , and suitablity for routine acid cleaning of the boiler . If you use a SS in the economizer via sect VIII, then you need to take deliberate measures to address these 2 issues.
 
1) Or you can use RA330 for the tubes - this alloy is essentially immune to chloride SCC.

2) Without a credible case for flame impingement, it is not "fired", IMHO
 
Hi. I have a feeling the ASME will not take the unfired from the economizers.
They would have to take it form the HSRG's and all the refinery equipment as well.
It's not going to happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor