Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Ellipsoidal V.S Torispherical

Status
Not open for further replies.

farzam

Mechanical
Nov 4, 2002
79
Dear All,

I have a vessel with ID=3500mm,DP=55barg, DT=300c,my recommendation for head is 2:1 ellipsoidal but our fabricator considered an approximation based on UG32(d)with knuckle radius0.17D and a spherical radius 0.9D.Thats acceptable but for thickness calculation he has applied 0.9D instead of D at ellips. formula.whats your idea?is it correct?and why?

Thank you very much
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

No, of course it isn't correct.
D is, as defined in UG-32(c), the inside diameter of the head skirt, and stays as such. The approximation permitted in UG-32(d) is only a matter of how to fabricate the head and of checking its shape, the calculation stays exactly as if it was an ellipsoidal.

prex
: Online tools for structural design
: Magnetic brakes for fun rides
: Air bearing pads
 
Dear prex

I asked him about this matter and the fabricator clarified that he applied K=0.9 in the ellips. cal. formula with the specified h.is this a correct answer?

Thanks
 
Dear prex,

depth of head (h) is 958mm.

Thanks
 
Sorry, the depth would 875 mm of course.
As this head is deeper than a 2:1 ellipsoid, it may be true that its thickness is lower, but to prove this according to the code the correct procedure is in 1-4.

prex
: Online tools for structural design
: Magnetic brakes for fun rides
: Air bearing pads
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor