conners
Mechanical
- Feb 22, 2005
- 2
Please could someone advise me on the following issue.
I am currently in the process of installating a solvent storage tank. The volume of the tank is 30 cubic meters and it is to contain Tetrahydrofuran. I have calculated that the maximum discharge requirement for the emergency relief device is 8870 NMCH/Air. I have used the method of calculation as outlined in the American Petroleum Institute (API)standard (Venting Atmospheric and Low Pressure Storage Tanks)
In this standard it states that certain environmental factors such as tank insulation can be input into the calculation to reduce the maximum required discharge rate.
However it also states that water spray systems should not be considered as environmental factors and therefore cannot be used to reduce the max discharge required.
I have been speaking to a supplier today who has told me that it is common practice to multiply the max discharge requirement of the emergency venting device by 0.3 if the tank is surrounded by a suitably approved fire protection system.
The tank I am installing will have a foam suppresion system covering the tanks entire surface area. The system will comply with NFPA 11a and NFPA 15 requirements.
Is it common practice to reduce the max discharge required from a emergency vent if the tank has a suitable water system around it?
Also is 0.3 the correct value to use as the environmental factor?
Advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated!
I am currently in the process of installating a solvent storage tank. The volume of the tank is 30 cubic meters and it is to contain Tetrahydrofuran. I have calculated that the maximum discharge requirement for the emergency relief device is 8870 NMCH/Air. I have used the method of calculation as outlined in the American Petroleum Institute (API)standard (Venting Atmospheric and Low Pressure Storage Tanks)
In this standard it states that certain environmental factors such as tank insulation can be input into the calculation to reduce the maximum required discharge rate.
However it also states that water spray systems should not be considered as environmental factors and therefore cannot be used to reduce the max discharge required.
I have been speaking to a supplier today who has told me that it is common practice to multiply the max discharge requirement of the emergency venting device by 0.3 if the tank is surrounded by a suitably approved fire protection system.
The tank I am installing will have a foam suppresion system covering the tanks entire surface area. The system will comply with NFPA 11a and NFPA 15 requirements.
Is it common practice to reduce the max discharge required from a emergency vent if the tank has a suitable water system around it?
Also is 0.3 the correct value to use as the environmental factor?
Advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated!