austim
Structural
- Mar 3, 2001
- 497
Today I was asked by my daughter - how far does the ESB sway due to wind ?. (One of her neighbours had suggested three metres !!).
Tall buildings are not in my area of expertise, so I visited the ESB official web site, and found this:
"The Empire State Building does not sway...it gives.
With a wind of 110 miles per hour, the Building gives 1.48 inches.
Movement off centre is never greater than one quarter inch, thus measurable movement is only one half inch, one quarter inch on each side".
On the face of it, there seems to be an inconsistency here (unless this is a pure PR statement, in which I ought not to expect fact or logic?).
I can live with the semantic refusal to call deflection under wind a "sway", (presumably the PR team at work?). However, I would welcome any explanation how the maximum deflection can be quoted as 1.48" in one sentence, and 0.25" in the next.
Wouldn't even 1.48" be remarkably low for a 1250 foot high building?
Tall buildings are not in my area of expertise, so I visited the ESB official web site, and found this:
"The Empire State Building does not sway...it gives.
With a wind of 110 miles per hour, the Building gives 1.48 inches.
Movement off centre is never greater than one quarter inch, thus measurable movement is only one half inch, one quarter inch on each side".
On the face of it, there seems to be an inconsistency here (unless this is a pure PR statement, in which I ought not to expect fact or logic?).
I can live with the semantic refusal to call deflection under wind a "sway", (presumably the PR team at work?). However, I would welcome any explanation how the maximum deflection can be quoted as 1.48" in one sentence, and 0.25" in the next.
Wouldn't even 1.48" be remarkably low for a 1250 foot high building?