bigmig
Structural
- Aug 8, 2008
- 401
I get asked by a lot of builders and homeowners how to come up with an architectural design that is "cost effective" to engineer.
In other words, they are trying to avoid getting to the 11th hour of construction only to find out that that "cool" architectural flair is now
blowing their budget apart because it takes a steel frame to support said flair.
They want to engineer it first, and 'architect' it second.
I tell them to keep on module (2 ft), to not take out all of the shear walls etc, to provide some spots to run columns etc, to maintain certain ratios
in regards to window vs wall, and beam vs span, to stay with conventional materials and methods (more subs to bid on these items, as compared to specialty subs),
to coordinate the MEP (mechanical - elec - plumbing) with joist layouts and directions etc.
Just curious what everyone's response is to this seemingly common question.
In other words, they are trying to avoid getting to the 11th hour of construction only to find out that that "cool" architectural flair is now
blowing their budget apart because it takes a steel frame to support said flair.
They want to engineer it first, and 'architect' it second.
I tell them to keep on module (2 ft), to not take out all of the shear walls etc, to provide some spots to run columns etc, to maintain certain ratios
in regards to window vs wall, and beam vs span, to stay with conventional materials and methods (more subs to bid on these items, as compared to specialty subs),
to coordinate the MEP (mechanical - elec - plumbing) with joist layouts and directions etc.
Just curious what everyone's response is to this seemingly common question.