Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Equation for transmissibility estimation

Status
Not open for further replies.

bgoo

Aerospace
Aug 22, 2006
12
Folks, Anybody have a good equation to estimate the transmissibility of the cylinder along the axis? (In my application, the cylinder is hanging vertically downward). Steinberg used the equation Q = 2 sqrt(fn) in some of his examples to estimate the transmissibility of beam structure. But I suspect the Q is orientation dependent and my not be applicale to my case.

Anywhere I can find of good collection of equation for estimating transmissibility of different structure?

Note; fn is resonance frequency

Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Can you define transmissibility, in your context? I don't see how it can be a single number for a start.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
 
Greg,

The tramissibility (Q) is simple the ratio of maximum output force to the maximum input force on a structure during vibration. At resonance, Q can be very high. Steinberg indicated that the force is proportion to square root of natural frequency of the structure.

Regards,
 
The quick answer is that you need to a finite element analysis combined with modal testing.

Here is a longer answer...

Q is the transmissibility at resonance, preferably for a single-degree-of-freedom system.

Q is related to the damping ratio. The damping must be measured for a given test item including its boundary condition.

Damping cannot be calculated using analytical formulas. Empirical damping formulas are questionable.

Furthermore, the response of a continuous structure or even a multi-degree-of-freedom system depends on eigenvectors, effective modal mass values, modal participations factors, as well as on the modal damping.

Cylinders are surprisingly complicated. A cylinder has two equations of motion, which include both bending and membrane response. These equations do not even include longitudinal or torsional motion.

I have posted a paper at:



Tom Irvine
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor