Albigger
Aerospace
- Dec 29, 2004
- 204
Hello,
Just wondering if there is an "equivalent" to solidworks hole wizard callouts in CATIA drafting mode. For instance, with one click, solidworks drafting will give you the hole size and depth, and any associated counterbores etc... and even the number of holes (if they were done as a pattern).
From what I gather, there is no such equivalent, but I'm hoping someone will prove me wrong. I also found 2 similar threads, but they are a bit aged and neither presented a complete solution:
in this thread, if I have 10 holes that were done as a userpattern, CATIA will put the diameter on all 10 holes, instead of calling out 1 hole x 10 places.
in this thread, solid7 suggests having manipulators turned on, which I do, but only threaded holes will allow me to add the true depth symbol after the text. For regular unthreaded holes this option is greyed out. Also, even if I could get the symbol but have to manually type the depth, it is non-associative, which still doesn't really help if there are updates to the model.
Thanks for any suggestions or workarounds.
Just wondering if there is an "equivalent" to solidworks hole wizard callouts in CATIA drafting mode. For instance, with one click, solidworks drafting will give you the hole size and depth, and any associated counterbores etc... and even the number of holes (if they were done as a pattern).
From what I gather, there is no such equivalent, but I'm hoping someone will prove me wrong. I also found 2 similar threads, but they are a bit aged and neither presented a complete solution:
in this thread, if I have 10 holes that were done as a userpattern, CATIA will put the diameter on all 10 holes, instead of calling out 1 hole x 10 places.
in this thread, solid7 suggests having manipulators turned on, which I do, but only threaded holes will allow me to add the true depth symbol after the text. For regular unthreaded holes this option is greyed out. Also, even if I could get the symbol but have to manually type the depth, it is non-associative, which still doesn't really help if there are updates to the model.
Thanks for any suggestions or workarounds.