RFreund
Structural
- Aug 14, 2010
- 1,885
When the use of micropiles (or pin piles, helical piers, etc) are used to repair a portion of an existing foundation, do you typically only use piles at the portion of the foundation that needs repair or do you extend the piles to a larger portion of the structure to avoid differential settlement.
Say for example the movement of the structure is isolated to one wall or a portion of a wall. There is cracking of the foundation walls and observed vertical movement. Say the movement is due to either soil desiccation or settlement of poor soils. If you only install piers at the location of damage is there concern of differential settlement or does this go by a case by case basis? I suppose a few borings are in order to determine this?
I thought this came up before but I can't seem to find anything. I have seen this done both ways - where piers are extended to both bearing walls of the structure even though only one wall has distress and where the piers are only located at the area of damage. Curious to hear others opinions.
EIT
Say for example the movement of the structure is isolated to one wall or a portion of a wall. There is cracking of the foundation walls and observed vertical movement. Say the movement is due to either soil desiccation or settlement of poor soils. If you only install piers at the location of damage is there concern of differential settlement or does this go by a case by case basis? I suppose a few borings are in order to determine this?
I thought this came up before but I can't seem to find anything. I have seen this done both ways - where piers are extended to both bearing walls of the structure even though only one wall has distress and where the piers are only located at the area of damage. Curious to hear others opinions.
EIT