isok89
Civil/Environmental
- May 9, 2016
- 37
Hi,
I am working on a three point bending test with a contact plate for thin walled beams.
Overall there is a symmetrical failure mode, for some beams there is an assymetrical failure mode.
For the assymetrical, yielding of the beam occurs at one side of the contact plate which leads to convergence issues if using the static solver as it is very sudden (dynamic). However when I use
the implicit dynamic solver, I get the symmetrical failure mode. Ultimate load of the experiment was 1614 N and my numerical analysis gives me 1615 N but the wrong failure mode.
so in short: experiments in lab show assymetrical failure mode, static solver shows clear assymetrical yielding prior to ultimate load and crashes as it can't handle dynamic effects. implicit dynamic solver convergences and has a symmetrical failure mode.
I do know that a colleague used the explicit dynamic solver and was able to simulate the assymetrical failure mode, but why can't that be the case with an implicit dynamic solver?
I am working on a three point bending test with a contact plate for thin walled beams.
Overall there is a symmetrical failure mode, for some beams there is an assymetrical failure mode.
For the assymetrical, yielding of the beam occurs at one side of the contact plate which leads to convergence issues if using the static solver as it is very sudden (dynamic). However when I use
the implicit dynamic solver, I get the symmetrical failure mode. Ultimate load of the experiment was 1614 N and my numerical analysis gives me 1615 N but the wrong failure mode.
so in short: experiments in lab show assymetrical failure mode, static solver shows clear assymetrical yielding prior to ultimate load and crashes as it can't handle dynamic effects. implicit dynamic solver convergences and has a symmetrical failure mode.
I do know that a colleague used the explicit dynamic solver and was able to simulate the assymetrical failure mode, but why can't that be the case with an implicit dynamic solver?