Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations The Obturator on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

FE stress analysis in VIII-2 Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.

ep0319

Mechanical
Apr 5, 2010
4
Hi everybody
I'm to perform stress analysis by FE of some details of a pressure vessel in VIII div. 2 in this way:

1. Thermal analysis -> temp map.
2. Mech analysis for primary stress: temp map from step 1 + mech loads giving primary stress (engineer judgment...). To not introduce thermal stress THE THERMAL EXPANSION COEFF ARE TO BE SET EQUAL TO 0.
3. Mech analysis for secondary stress: temp map from step 1 + mech loads giving secondary stresses. THERMAL EXP COEFF. SET TO ACTUAL VALUES.

I'd use these procedure for both linear analysis (steps 1 and 2) and non-linear analysis (steps 1 to 3).
Please let me know if I'm right
Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Nope. Simply put, the terms "secondary stress" and "nonlinear" should not be combined. Its either one (linear) or the other.

jt
 
jte,
You'y right... I've been confused by the limits of the stresses...

But, despite that, my concern was about the way I split the calculation in steps 1 to 3.

Thanks again
 
I disagree. According to Bednar, page 24, secondary loads can be non-linear, causing local deformation, but they are self-limiting, so that they do not lead to failure even though they cause a slight deformation. Fig 2.1 on page 26 shows a stepwise deformation then return to the elastic range.
 
MrBTU - in the context of performing a "nonlinear" analysis, the classification of stresses is irrelevant (that's what jte is saying). If you classify, then you have to do an elastic/linear analysis. If you do a nonlinear analysis, then no classification.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor