sauce_man
Structural
- Apr 14, 2020
- 31
I am currently working through a floor vibration study for a very sensitive imaging type program. I am targeting 1000 mips and there is some pretty significant difference in response for framing members and shells. Since we are working with a full SAP model, it seems logical to me that we should consider the vibration response in slab areas between supporting frame members.
There is so dated literature around (I assume related to v1 of DG11) stating that the response should only be measured at frames, and not areas. Is there any basis for this? In my mind, the position of equipment is not limited to the supporting frame members, so why would we neglect area elements?
I am also considering an increase in stiffness for slab elements in the strong deck direction (currently the slab is a uniform 3.5" thickness).
TIA
There is so dated literature around (I assume related to v1 of DG11) stating that the response should only be measured at frames, and not areas. Is there any basis for this? In my mind, the position of equipment is not limited to the supporting frame members, so why would we neglect area elements?
I am also considering an increase in stiffness for slab elements in the strong deck direction (currently the slab is a uniform 3.5" thickness).
TIA