chrislsnider
Structural
- Sep 5, 2012
- 27
I'm looking for a little insight here since my searching is coming up empty.
Looking at FEMA P-361, 7.3.5 it says:
If I consider a steel deck acting as the form with 4" of reinforced concrete over top, I have always been under the impression that this complies with the missile impact requirements. In fact, I consider this above the FEMA impact requirements since later in chapter 7 it is noted that concrete over a metal deck contained the spalling of the large concrete barrel (see page 7-29).
My question is, since most of the other FEMA assemblies are "pre-approved" for impact resistance, has there been any documented impact testing done of this type of roof system?
Looking at FEMA P-361, 7.3.5 it says:
"The TTU research also shows that a 4-inch-thick reinforced concrete roof provides sufficient protection from a 5-lb wood 2x4 missile impacting at 67 mph (the free-falling missile impact speed recommended in this document)."
If I consider a steel deck acting as the form with 4" of reinforced concrete over top, I have always been under the impression that this complies with the missile impact requirements. In fact, I consider this above the FEMA impact requirements since later in chapter 7 it is noted that concrete over a metal deck contained the spalling of the large concrete barrel (see page 7-29).
My question is, since most of the other FEMA assemblies are "pre-approved" for impact resistance, has there been any documented impact testing done of this type of roof system?