ianmcq26
Chemical
- Feb 8, 2007
- 4
Dear All
I am currently performing a GAP analysis to determine whether there are deficiencies with our existing plant safety systems.
We have a fired heater with three forced draft burners. The fuel and combustion air flows are controlled using a burner management system that is within our DCS (BPCS).
An action has been raised to assess whether a hard-wired fuel-air ratio trip is required in the event that; should a deviation in combustion air flow fall below the stoichiometric requirements for a period of time due to a fault within the DCS, a hazardous scenario could occur as excess fuel enters the heater.
Currently we have hard-wired trips to shut-down the fuel supply in the event of loss of air fan or low flow (and the design and other trips generally conforms to guidance given in relevant API and NFPA standards).
Currently air is supplied with an excess of 15% (equivalent to 1.5 excess oxygen), however the low flow trip is specified at ~25% of the design flow and therefore there is potential that this would not prevent the hazardous scenario.
My first inclination would be to specify the new hard-wired trip set at the stiochiometric limit ie zero excess air, but I accept that this could introduce the risk of spurious trip scenarios.
Can anyone provide me with some guidance regarding a more practical solution or whether there is a margin of safety with a reduced air flow below stoichiometric requirements?
Why does this not appear to be addressed in the relevant codes?
Best Regards
Ian
I am currently performing a GAP analysis to determine whether there are deficiencies with our existing plant safety systems.
We have a fired heater with three forced draft burners. The fuel and combustion air flows are controlled using a burner management system that is within our DCS (BPCS).
An action has been raised to assess whether a hard-wired fuel-air ratio trip is required in the event that; should a deviation in combustion air flow fall below the stoichiometric requirements for a period of time due to a fault within the DCS, a hazardous scenario could occur as excess fuel enters the heater.
Currently we have hard-wired trips to shut-down the fuel supply in the event of loss of air fan or low flow (and the design and other trips generally conforms to guidance given in relevant API and NFPA standards).
Currently air is supplied with an excess of 15% (equivalent to 1.5 excess oxygen), however the low flow trip is specified at ~25% of the design flow and therefore there is potential that this would not prevent the hazardous scenario.
My first inclination would be to specify the new hard-wired trip set at the stiochiometric limit ie zero excess air, but I accept that this could introduce the risk of spurious trip scenarios.
Can anyone provide me with some guidance regarding a more practical solution or whether there is a margin of safety with a reduced air flow below stoichiometric requirements?
Why does this not appear to be addressed in the relevant codes?
Best Regards
Ian