cht13er
Civil/Environmental
- Jul 14, 2010
- 33
I have a strange issue. As shown on the attached sketch, a small creek is flooding over a road (approx 2').
Above/upstream of the bridge, the creek's banks completely contain the flow - but when it hits the bridge flows are forced around the concrete walls on either side of the road. Downstream of the bridge, flows are once again able to be conveyed in the creek with no flooding above the banks.
I've highlighted two areas in pink immediately upstream and downstream of the bridge. Upstream of the bridge I can see how there could not be any flooding - there is essentially a drop from teh top of the creek's bank to the road.
But downstream of the road -- how does water immediately get sucked into the creek again? Should that dotted floodline (which I'm saying exists even though HEC-RAS currently says it does not) be 1:1 back to the creek ... or should it follow the quickest way back to the creek (e.g. "water drop" tool in CAD)...?
Thanks for your thoughts!
Chris
Above/upstream of the bridge, the creek's banks completely contain the flow - but when it hits the bridge flows are forced around the concrete walls on either side of the road. Downstream of the bridge, flows are once again able to be conveyed in the creek with no flooding above the banks.
I've highlighted two areas in pink immediately upstream and downstream of the bridge. Upstream of the bridge I can see how there could not be any flooding - there is essentially a drop from teh top of the creek's bank to the road.
But downstream of the road -- how does water immediately get sucked into the creek again? Should that dotted floodline (which I'm saying exists even though HEC-RAS currently says it does not) be 1:1 back to the creek ... or should it follow the quickest way back to the creek (e.g. "water drop" tool in CAD)...?
Thanks for your thoughts!
Chris