Acousteau
Electrical
- Mar 7, 2007
- 1
Hi, I'm new here, thanks for reading my question.
I have some thick-walled cylindrical tubes that were custom machined out of 1.5"D 17-4PH rod. These parts are going to be used in an ultrasonic wave generator which has to have the lowest acoustic damping possible: the SS tubes will be conducting acoustic waves along their length and must not attenuate / absorb the acoustic energy. The less attenuation, the better. It's a critical issue in this case.
I have read that metals carrying longitudinal acoustic vibrations exhibit lesser absorption of the acoustic energy with increasing yield strength. Materials with the highest yield strength have the least acoustic attenuation, the least pillow-like absorption of energy. I hope this rule-of-thumb doesn't have many exceptions.
Age hardening the -PH state alloy into H900 state causes an increase in yield strength, so I'd like to age harden the pieces I have before installing them in the prototype device. I have a simple, cheap ceramics kiln with a homemade temperature regulator that can hold the kiln temperature steady within 3'C.
The information I've googled online gives the consensus that I can slowly (?) heat the 17-4PH pieces to 482'C, hold for 1 hour, then "air quench", which for me means, open the lid of the kiln and let 'em cool down. Then I'll supposedly have pieces of 17-4 H900... if I'm lucky, and don't mess it up somehow. There is supposed to be no deformation from this process (H900 at least) and a very slight shrinkage.
Any opinions? Can I age-harden to H900 in a ceramics kiln, in atmospheric air, as long as the temperature and time are accurate? What does heating "slowly" mean? 17-4PH is supposed to be "simple" to age-harden. Is it *this* simple?
- Most of all, I need to find the alloys of aluminum and SS which have the absolute lowest attenuation of longitudinal ultrasonic waves (low band, between 20 - 80 kHz) possible. So far I am using 7075-T651 aluminum rod (waveguide section, must be a aluminum) and 17-4PH stainless rod (piezoelectric backweight section, must be heavier than aluminum and very strong). I settled on these alloys by opting for the highest yield strength among all the alloys available in low quantity online. Any opinions or suggestions ... or guesses ... would be awesome to hear. There is so much to learn. Thanks guys!
- Graham
I have some thick-walled cylindrical tubes that were custom machined out of 1.5"D 17-4PH rod. These parts are going to be used in an ultrasonic wave generator which has to have the lowest acoustic damping possible: the SS tubes will be conducting acoustic waves along their length and must not attenuate / absorb the acoustic energy. The less attenuation, the better. It's a critical issue in this case.
I have read that metals carrying longitudinal acoustic vibrations exhibit lesser absorption of the acoustic energy with increasing yield strength. Materials with the highest yield strength have the least acoustic attenuation, the least pillow-like absorption of energy. I hope this rule-of-thumb doesn't have many exceptions.
Age hardening the -PH state alloy into H900 state causes an increase in yield strength, so I'd like to age harden the pieces I have before installing them in the prototype device. I have a simple, cheap ceramics kiln with a homemade temperature regulator that can hold the kiln temperature steady within 3'C.
The information I've googled online gives the consensus that I can slowly (?) heat the 17-4PH pieces to 482'C, hold for 1 hour, then "air quench", which for me means, open the lid of the kiln and let 'em cool down. Then I'll supposedly have pieces of 17-4 H900... if I'm lucky, and don't mess it up somehow. There is supposed to be no deformation from this process (H900 at least) and a very slight shrinkage.
Any opinions? Can I age-harden to H900 in a ceramics kiln, in atmospheric air, as long as the temperature and time are accurate? What does heating "slowly" mean? 17-4PH is supposed to be "simple" to age-harden. Is it *this* simple?
- Most of all, I need to find the alloys of aluminum and SS which have the absolute lowest attenuation of longitudinal ultrasonic waves (low band, between 20 - 80 kHz) possible. So far I am using 7075-T651 aluminum rod (waveguide section, must be a aluminum) and 17-4PH stainless rod (piezoelectric backweight section, must be heavier than aluminum and very strong). I settled on these alloys by opting for the highest yield strength among all the alloys available in low quantity online. Any opinions or suggestions ... or guesses ... would be awesome to hear. There is so much to learn. Thanks guys!
- Graham