Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet
Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals
-
Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Gas Engines Running on Lighter HC
- Thread starter hduncan
- Start date
patprimmer
New member
There are quite a few long and informative threads on this, Do a search so the people who donate their time to this forum don't waste it by continually duplicating previous work
Regards
pat
Regards
pat
I agree with Pat about in-depth searches -- but, in brief:
Thermodynamically, the power from a given mass of fuel is related to its phase (e.g., gas vs liquid) and to the energy release from oxidizing reactions (breaking of chemical bonds in the fuel, and making of bonds between fuel elements and oxygen). Carbon produces much more energy for a given mass than does hydrogen -- therefore the lighter elements, which have less carbon, have a lower 'heat content' for a given volume. You can do a simple stoichiometric calculation for a particular fuel molecule, or for a known mix of molecules, get the heat energy release per mole or gram, and this is a first-level answer to your question: lighter fuels have lower effective energy per gram, and liquid fuels are denser than gaseous ones under sane operating conditions...
There are other considerations, of course. Gaseous fuels are often easier to carburete (mix with oxygen), and can often be combusted with fewer by-products (pollution) under engine service conditions. In many cases -- for example, operating a forklift inside a warehouse -- these kind of advantages outweigh the increased fuel volume, special containers, higher gph consumption for equivalent output hp/torque, etc. that the gaseous or light fuel use entails.
hduncan, you have lots of reading and research to do to get a detailed story. But if this was only a casual question, this might be enough.
Thermodynamically, the power from a given mass of fuel is related to its phase (e.g., gas vs liquid) and to the energy release from oxidizing reactions (breaking of chemical bonds in the fuel, and making of bonds between fuel elements and oxygen). Carbon produces much more energy for a given mass than does hydrogen -- therefore the lighter elements, which have less carbon, have a lower 'heat content' for a given volume. You can do a simple stoichiometric calculation for a particular fuel molecule, or for a known mix of molecules, get the heat energy release per mole or gram, and this is a first-level answer to your question: lighter fuels have lower effective energy per gram, and liquid fuels are denser than gaseous ones under sane operating conditions...
There are other considerations, of course. Gaseous fuels are often easier to carburete (mix with oxygen), and can often be combusted with fewer by-products (pollution) under engine service conditions. In many cases -- for example, operating a forklift inside a warehouse -- these kind of advantages outweigh the increased fuel volume, special containers, higher gph consumption for equivalent output hp/torque, etc. that the gaseous or light fuel use entails.
hduncan, you have lots of reading and research to do to get a detailed story. But if this was only a casual question, this might be enough.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question