brutus1955
Mechanical
- Aug 19, 2003
- 57
ok, let me preface my question
1. a three phase alternator, that can be connected in wye or delta
2. i don't care about frequency, the speed will be fixed at ~5000 rpm whether connected as wye or delta
3. the output voltage needs to be the same whether is it connected as wye or delta
4. the rpm stays the same, but excitation changes to maintain the same voltage whether connected in wye or delta.
now the question
given these criteria above, what if any differences in efficiency might there be with the machine, being connected either in wye or delta.
basically is there an advantage efficiency wise to the alternator given these parameters? now i am concerned with just the alternator itself and not other transmission advantages of one or the other connection type.
it comes to mind that "phase to phase" the wye connected machine has a larger stator resistance than "phase to phase" of the delta connected option.
is this so in practice?
if so would that be a significant contributor to any possible difference in efficiency?
thanks
bob g
1. a three phase alternator, that can be connected in wye or delta
2. i don't care about frequency, the speed will be fixed at ~5000 rpm whether connected as wye or delta
3. the output voltage needs to be the same whether is it connected as wye or delta
4. the rpm stays the same, but excitation changes to maintain the same voltage whether connected in wye or delta.
now the question
given these criteria above, what if any differences in efficiency might there be with the machine, being connected either in wye or delta.
basically is there an advantage efficiency wise to the alternator given these parameters? now i am concerned with just the alternator itself and not other transmission advantages of one or the other connection type.
it comes to mind that "phase to phase" the wye connected machine has a larger stator resistance than "phase to phase" of the delta connected option.
is this so in practice?
if so would that be a significant contributor to any possible difference in efficiency?
thanks
bob g