MCMLXX
Civil/Environmental
- Jul 20, 2016
- 1
Hello,
Have a quick question regarding the gradation chart for NYSDOT Type 2 Subbase material (Specification 733-04 New York State DOT). The chart is as follows:
Sieve...........%Passing By Weight
4".....................-
3".....................-
2".....................100
1/4"..................25-60
NO. 40................5-40
No. 200...............0-10
Because there is such a large gap between the 2" and the 1/4", would a mix of material with the largest stone size being 1/2" meet this gradation? Technically that size passes 100% at 2" and does not pass thru the 1/4".
For subbase material, I would expect there to be some larger material (2"-1") in the mix. For what I typically see, the gradation is broken down past the 100% with something just beneath at 91% to 95% helping to set a condition where a certain % of a larger stone size in the mix is expected. If the range is intentional, then would it be correct to view the range from 2" to 1/4" a linear line as a method of ensuring a good mix? Maybe it doesn't matter from a structural standpoint and as long as 40% does not pass the 1/4", then it doesn't matter what size it is as long as it passes 2"?
I do not believe this is considered a 'gap' gradation, but could be wrong.
Thanks,
Have a quick question regarding the gradation chart for NYSDOT Type 2 Subbase material (Specification 733-04 New York State DOT). The chart is as follows:
Sieve...........%Passing By Weight
4".....................-
3".....................-
2".....................100
1/4"..................25-60
NO. 40................5-40
No. 200...............0-10
Because there is such a large gap between the 2" and the 1/4", would a mix of material with the largest stone size being 1/2" meet this gradation? Technically that size passes 100% at 2" and does not pass thru the 1/4".
For subbase material, I would expect there to be some larger material (2"-1") in the mix. For what I typically see, the gradation is broken down past the 100% with something just beneath at 91% to 95% helping to set a condition where a certain % of a larger stone size in the mix is expected. If the range is intentional, then would it be correct to view the range from 2" to 1/4" a linear line as a method of ensuring a good mix? Maybe it doesn't matter from a structural standpoint and as long as 40% does not pass the 1/4", then it doesn't matter what size it is as long as it passes 2"?
I do not believe this is considered a 'gap' gradation, but could be wrong.
Thanks,