Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations Danlap on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Grade Beam and Helical Piles Concrete Section

Status
Not open for further replies.

Big Jilm

Structural
May 1, 2013
6
Good Day All,

I've been circling around on this design for a while now. I have read a few of the forum posts on it and done the analysis a couple of different ways. When working with residential, lightly loaded helical piles it has been asserted that the most common execution of these piles is to bypass a reinfirced concrete beam at the bottom of the wall (some might mistake this as a footing) and rely on the 8" concrete wall itself and sink the pile, surveyed into place mid-bm horizontally, and placed vertically with plate 4"-6" into the wall section. I have analysed the members, spaced to a max. of 12-14 feet, and determined that this works in normal beam design. Of course, techinically this would be considered a deep beam. While I'm less confident with my calcs on this, new to me 'strut and tie' method, it also confirmed that essentially, (2)-#5's top and bottom and #5's at 12"o.c. both ways down the middle for an 8"x 36" or 48" depth works just fine in this condition. My question relates to whether or not I should have stirrups instead of vertical bar. Also there is the consideration for 'skin reinforcement' that I'm neglecting in the centered bar design. I am considering going to a mat of (2)-#5's horizontally with #4 stirrups at 12"o.c. which I think is overkill, but would provide a little piece of mind. I recall KootK suggesting something similar in another post and am curious what others do.

Kind Regards,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor