What was the reason for moving away from pen graded to viscosity graded asphalt cement?. Was the reason based on research of the behaviour of asphalt cements and performance of resulting mixes or was this just because someone decided to use a specification because it was coined from a North American jurisdiction.
It would be beneficial if you examine the reasons for this change as you will find that in your climate there is really no need to be sophisticated but to use what has worked well in relation to pen grade asphalt cements.
I presume that you were accustomed to use 60-70 pen asphalt. Hence you are wary about not getting similar penetrations but now faced with the fact that the viscosity satisfies the specifications and you are not certain what those numbers mean to your ultimate pavement performance.
However,it seems that you require to meet both the pen and vis requirements. If this is the case then the bitumen with pen 92 is not acceptable. Or is your specification based on viscosity only. In that case, you may have to institute changes, but may face contractual problems.
Too often specs are imported from another jurisdiction without anyone truly understanding the reasons why the specs were developed for that jurisdiction. This seems to be a case of specs copied by a Consultant carte blanche from standard specifications of some jurisdiction. Perhaps, the flair of sophistication of the "viscosity" tests was a ploy to demonstrate that the specifier has some advanced knowledge.
It is a pity that effort is not taken to understand first what has worked well over the years in your climate by those who wish to promote something different to those who may be less knowledgeable, but perhaps have a lot of local experience.
If the specs were concoted by a consultant let him decide what do.
Finally, use your local experience to discuss the pros and cons of pen grade versus viscosity graded asphalts in your climate. I would bet that the Consultant would be hard pressed to provide suitable and acceptable reasons.