Okiryu
Civil/Environmental
- Sep 13, 2013
- 1,094
In my area, since we do not have flowable fill available, we are planning to use clean gravel (20mm~40mm) for backfill at depths where compaction cannot be attained. Close to the surface (GL-1.50m), the excavation is wider so compaction can be done. We are planning to use clay on top of the clean gravels compacted to 90% modified proctor.
The area then will be covered with grass. Surcharge loads are not expected. The excavation was done for placement of a utility manhole, so the gravel will be surrounding the manhole. Depth of excavation was approx. 2.5 m. No groudwater.
I think that clays due to their cohesion are more resistant to erosion so wash out of fines thru the gravel voids may not be an issue.
I have received different opinions from my reviewers, telling me that clean gravel is not adequate since it cannot be compacted and therefore can create future settlement problems. I think that with a slight vibration, gravels can "interlock" well and therefore I do not agree with the reviewer's opinion about future settlement.
Any comments about this? or any other options for backfill in areas where compaction cannot be attained?
The area then will be covered with grass. Surcharge loads are not expected. The excavation was done for placement of a utility manhole, so the gravel will be surrounding the manhole. Depth of excavation was approx. 2.5 m. No groudwater.
I think that clays due to their cohesion are more resistant to erosion so wash out of fines thru the gravel voids may not be an issue.
I have received different opinions from my reviewers, telling me that clean gravel is not adequate since it cannot be compacted and therefore can create future settlement problems. I think that with a slight vibration, gravels can "interlock" well and therefore I do not agree with the reviewer's opinion about future settlement.
Any comments about this? or any other options for backfill in areas where compaction cannot be attained?