prc
Electrical
- Aug 18, 2001
- 2,008
Normally one corner of delta connected stabilizing tertiary winding is grounded in service or neutral grounding achieved through grounding transformers or star connected electromagnetic PTs connected to tertiary terminals. Latest IEC 60076-3 Insulation levels of Transformers proposes as below:
B.3 Power-frequency transferred overvoltage
If a low-voltage winding which is physically adjacent to the high-voltage winding is left without connection to earth or with only a high-impedance connection to earth while the high-voltage winding is energised, there is a risk of power frequency overvoltage by capacitance division.
The risk is obvious for a single-phase winding, but it can also exist for a three-phase winding if the primary winding voltage becomes asymmetric, as occurs during earth faults. In particular circumstances, resonance conditions may arise.
Tertiary windings and stabilizing windings in large transformers are also subjected to the same
risk. It is the responsibility of the purchaser to prevent a tertiary winding from being accidentally left with too high an impedance to earth. A stabilizing winding should normally be arranged for permanent connection to earth (tank) either externally or internally.
The overvoltage is determined by capacitances between windings and between windings and
earth. These can be measured at low frequency from the terminal of the transformer in
different combinations, and they can also be calculated with sufficient accuracy. Unquote
But grounding of one corner of delta has a problem esp in large EHV auto banks where the bus work on bus support insulators will be substantial for forming the closed delta. In case of one more grounding(through bus insulators etc) it will form a LL fault on tertiary. My query is- with enhanced tertiary insulation (say 52 kv in 33 KV tertiary) can we avoid the corner grounding of delta tertiary? How is the practice in other countries?
B.3 Power-frequency transferred overvoltage
If a low-voltage winding which is physically adjacent to the high-voltage winding is left without connection to earth or with only a high-impedance connection to earth while the high-voltage winding is energised, there is a risk of power frequency overvoltage by capacitance division.
The risk is obvious for a single-phase winding, but it can also exist for a three-phase winding if the primary winding voltage becomes asymmetric, as occurs during earth faults. In particular circumstances, resonance conditions may arise.
Tertiary windings and stabilizing windings in large transformers are also subjected to the same
risk. It is the responsibility of the purchaser to prevent a tertiary winding from being accidentally left with too high an impedance to earth. A stabilizing winding should normally be arranged for permanent connection to earth (tank) either externally or internally.
The overvoltage is determined by capacitances between windings and between windings and
earth. These can be measured at low frequency from the terminal of the transformer in
different combinations, and they can also be calculated with sufficient accuracy. Unquote
But grounding of one corner of delta has a problem esp in large EHV auto banks where the bus work on bus support insulators will be substantial for forming the closed delta. In case of one more grounding(through bus insulators etc) it will form a LL fault on tertiary. My query is- with enhanced tertiary insulation (say 52 kv in 33 KV tertiary) can we avoid the corner grounding of delta tertiary? How is the practice in other countries?