tikitime
Mechanical
- Apr 9, 2002
- 23
I have a building in central florida that is being used to dry parachutes. The existing ahu to dry the parachutes is an off the shelf dx split unit. Consequently it takes a week to dry the parachutes. One of the mods I am working on is to replace the ahu so that drying time is reduced to a day. The user wants the new unit to use a dehumidification coil - not a desicant system.
I have talked to several vendors and they have been giving me conflicting info. One says to use 100% outside air, another says to modulate the Oa and Ra values bbased on the dewpoint of the OA, and another says to use 100% RA.
100% OA vendor says that the dewpoint of the OA will be less than the air in the building. I don't think that is true for florida where the ASHRAE design values 93 db / 80 wb have a 76 dewpoint.
The OA/RA vendor says that the amount of OA should be based on the OA dewpoint. This way when the OA dp is low enough, less dehumidification will be required. But this option will require more complicated controls. I don't think this is justified considering the number of times we will be able to use OA. Also the unit will be run only a few times a year.
The 100% RA vendor says that the time when the Oa dp is low enough to justify using OA is so limited, it's not worth using. Also he says that the moisture from the parachutes is a known quatitiy that can be designed for whereas OA is unknown and requires a larger unit.
Does anyone have a take on all this?
Thanks!
I have talked to several vendors and they have been giving me conflicting info. One says to use 100% outside air, another says to modulate the Oa and Ra values bbased on the dewpoint of the OA, and another says to use 100% RA.
100% OA vendor says that the dewpoint of the OA will be less than the air in the building. I don't think that is true for florida where the ASHRAE design values 93 db / 80 wb have a 76 dewpoint.
The OA/RA vendor says that the amount of OA should be based on the OA dewpoint. This way when the OA dp is low enough, less dehumidification will be required. But this option will require more complicated controls. I don't think this is justified considering the number of times we will be able to use OA. Also the unit will be run only a few times a year.
The 100% RA vendor says that the time when the Oa dp is low enough to justify using OA is so limited, it's not worth using. Also he says that the moisture from the parachutes is a known quatitiy that can be designed for whereas OA is unknown and requires a larger unit.
Does anyone have a take on all this?
Thanks!