Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

High pressure-hot water vessel

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jay_

Mechanical
Feb 20, 2019
99
Hello All,
We are in the stage of quotation for a water tank with an operating pressure of 16 Bars and temperature of 95c, the vertical pressure vessel is located in a confined place (limited in height).
The high pressure of 16 bars is produced due to the high rise building.
The building is limiting us to construct the heads as torispherical heads; the problem with torispherical heads is the knuckle radius, we cant do a large knuckle radius here in the local market due to its large dimension and the large head thickness. The other alternative is to buy it from the outside market which is also not very economical. We are used to fabricate the heads as hemispherical due to its economical shape. But the problem with hemispherical head in this case is the height limitation or else the client will loose alot of its required capacity.
Now i know that flat heads are not recommended due to very well reasons and i know you can’t use stiffeners for internal pressure unless other wise per U2(g).
Now my question is, is there any other standard i can design this tank with?
And also how economical is to use flatheads with stiffeners for internal pressure.
Tank diameter is around 1600mm. Constructed of stainless steel 316/316L.

Detailing is a hobby,
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Why not use semi-elliptical 2:1 heads? Not as strong as a hemi, but stronger than a torispherical head. Not as tall as a hemi, but taller than a tori.
 
You might also look at using multiple tanks (say, 4) all plumbed together with total capacity as required.
 
Blind flange to asme b16.47??

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
 
That'd be a 150# in 316, probably 300# in 316L. 3" / 5.94" thk in 60". No 62" in this standard.

Maybe UG-34. Likely need not be removable.

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
Try with semi-elliptical 2:1 and E=1, with SS 316 t=10 mm.

Regards
 
The OP said about 1600mm. Largest flange is 60".

Pretty thick for sure but an option if you want a flat end...



Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
 
Select heads at your convenience, then increase shell diameter with conical transition.

Regards
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor