Chubbybubby
Electrical
- Apr 8, 2022
- 2
I work in the electric industry and I come from the OEM side -- I don't have much experience on the consulting engineering side. One thing I am unfamiliar with is how the process works between engineer and designers/technicians, and possible drafters. Thinking about it more and more, the more I realize that I don't truly understand the process and therefore cannot understand where I can improve the process.
Assuming that one works with the other drafter, technician, or designer for extended periods of time, one would likely be very well acquainted and familiar with the capabilities of one-another, so hashing out a new design should be relatively streamlined. For example, an engineer and designer that have worked together know each other's capabilities strengths/weaknesses, so teamwork is much more effective.
However, let's say one had to work with a pure drafter, or a junior designer/engineer that one hasn't worked with, and hash out a design. In other words, "starting from scratch".
As an engineer, can you share some of your experiences on how you've learned, worked with, and honed this process in your years of practice?
e.g. (not all good practices)
Do you let them do a preliminary design on their own and only review it?
Do you do the design first in CAD yourself and have them detail it?
Do you do a crude or detailed sketch and have them translate it into a drawing?
Do you refer them to past projects and have them do a design based off that?
How long do you spend on the initial design and what kind of "package" do you end up giving your designer? Or some variation of the sort?
It seems that working with drafters that do not understand the technical content that is being drawn or designed is not a situation one wants to find themselves in, unless you are instead only doing basic detailing or doing parts /3D modelling based off 2D.
e.g.
For a good designer in the instance of a substation control building and substation yard:
- I need you to run cable from A to B for this equipment. Here are the drawings, go from there and I'll review it when it's done.
For another designer without as much experience, you instead instruct him/her:
- I need you to run a 2016 covered trench from A to B, run a 4/0 AWG bare copper cable inside it, control cables run in the utilities specified cable type, etc.
Vs. Even more and more details provided by the engineer, with increasing design details until he/she to an outside observer appears as the designer/drafter.
I'd be rather curious to see the actual process behind those drawings that we see created ever so often and curious to know what style has worked for both you and your peers the best. I think that's a pretty fascinating process, in itself.
Assuming that one works with the other drafter, technician, or designer for extended periods of time, one would likely be very well acquainted and familiar with the capabilities of one-another, so hashing out a new design should be relatively streamlined. For example, an engineer and designer that have worked together know each other's capabilities strengths/weaknesses, so teamwork is much more effective.
However, let's say one had to work with a pure drafter, or a junior designer/engineer that one hasn't worked with, and hash out a design. In other words, "starting from scratch".
As an engineer, can you share some of your experiences on how you've learned, worked with, and honed this process in your years of practice?
e.g. (not all good practices)
Do you let them do a preliminary design on their own and only review it?
Do you do the design first in CAD yourself and have them detail it?
Do you do a crude or detailed sketch and have them translate it into a drawing?
Do you refer them to past projects and have them do a design based off that?
How long do you spend on the initial design and what kind of "package" do you end up giving your designer? Or some variation of the sort?
It seems that working with drafters that do not understand the technical content that is being drawn or designed is not a situation one wants to find themselves in, unless you are instead only doing basic detailing or doing parts /3D modelling based off 2D.
e.g.
For a good designer in the instance of a substation control building and substation yard:
- I need you to run cable from A to B for this equipment. Here are the drawings, go from there and I'll review it when it's done.
For another designer without as much experience, you instead instruct him/her:
- I need you to run a 2016 covered trench from A to B, run a 4/0 AWG bare copper cable inside it, control cables run in the utilities specified cable type, etc.
Vs. Even more and more details provided by the engineer, with increasing design details until he/she to an outside observer appears as the designer/drafter.
I'd be rather curious to see the actual process behind those drawings that we see created ever so often and curious to know what style has worked for both you and your peers the best. I think that's a pretty fascinating process, in itself.