mechengineer
Mechanical
- Apr 19, 2001
- 265
PV design engineer effective work is only a few weeks (1st revision of drawing and calculation) which is about 10% of total engineering man-hour for a pressure vessel design. Others, 90% is the drawing and calculation review.
It is very low efficient for the review. Why it needs so long time? Some projects drag for more than one year, it is not rare. The reasons may be 1. Pressure vessel is customized design, not standardizing. 2. A user pay money to EPC and EPC control the review. If EPC has no control or limit for how many times for the engineering document review, nobody can do it. It was a real case when I worked in an EPC company that the design review was already to construction in revision 3 in three months. This project payment based on man-hours by the user, there was still a lot of man hours not used, so the company passed the design to a subsidiary company review again to shear the benefits. 3. Some review engineers (static engineer) in EPC are lack enough of knowledge and experience in pressure vessel design & fabrication.
In view of manufacturer, as a supplier, have to provide a good service. They (engineering) are only way to update without ending even if there are a lot of comment unnecessary, repeat, mistakes …., as some reasons in most of cases manufacturers (project team) would not stop the comment from client.
I have no idea…,
It is very low efficient for the review. Why it needs so long time? Some projects drag for more than one year, it is not rare. The reasons may be 1. Pressure vessel is customized design, not standardizing. 2. A user pay money to EPC and EPC control the review. If EPC has no control or limit for how many times for the engineering document review, nobody can do it. It was a real case when I worked in an EPC company that the design review was already to construction in revision 3 in three months. This project payment based on man-hours by the user, there was still a lot of man hours not used, so the company passed the design to a subsidiary company review again to shear the benefits. 3. Some review engineers (static engineer) in EPC are lack enough of knowledge and experience in pressure vessel design & fabrication.
In view of manufacturer, as a supplier, have to provide a good service. They (engineering) are only way to update without ending even if there are a lot of comment unnecessary, repeat, mistakes …., as some reasons in most of cases manufacturers (project team) would not stop the comment from client.
I have no idea…,