Hurly26
Structural
- Nov 19, 2015
- 2
All,
A colleague and myself are trying to figure out how you would go about applying a load to an area that you have drawn in SAP2000. The steel structure model is built and all of the appropriate assigns are in place. This is a 3 story building with the first and second floors being covered in concrete. What we're trying to figure out now, is how we go about modeling a null (no physical properties) area on top of this concrete. We can't model the areas on top of the beams alone because the areas are smaller than the center to center spacing of the beams. The way it's drawn in now, the null area is in the same plane as the concrete floor and only one portion of any of these null areas rests on a beam. When the analysis is run, SAP2000 is assuming these null areas are only supported on the beams instead of being on the concrete and so, any portion of the null area that isn't over the beam is showing massive deflections on the scale of billions which is obviously incorrect. Furthermore, a simple glance at the shear diagrams or deflected shape is proving that the loads are not going through the concrete and then distributed to the beams as intended.
If you have any thoughts on the matter, I would greatly appreciate them.
Thank you
A colleague and myself are trying to figure out how you would go about applying a load to an area that you have drawn in SAP2000. The steel structure model is built and all of the appropriate assigns are in place. This is a 3 story building with the first and second floors being covered in concrete. What we're trying to figure out now, is how we go about modeling a null (no physical properties) area on top of this concrete. We can't model the areas on top of the beams alone because the areas are smaller than the center to center spacing of the beams. The way it's drawn in now, the null area is in the same plane as the concrete floor and only one portion of any of these null areas rests on a beam. When the analysis is run, SAP2000 is assuming these null areas are only supported on the beams instead of being on the concrete and so, any portion of the null area that isn't over the beam is showing massive deflections on the scale of billions which is obviously incorrect. Furthermore, a simple glance at the shear diagrams or deflected shape is proving that the loads are not going through the concrete and then distributed to the beams as intended.
If you have any thoughts on the matter, I would greatly appreciate them.
Thank you