CaptainCrunch
Mechanical
- May 8, 2002
- 31
Hello All,
I have a tamper application that experiences very high amplitude, very low frequency vibration (e.g. 20g @ 0-3 Hz) when tamping a hard surface. Normally to reproduce field data on the shaker I exclude the 0-10 Hz vibration data and run 10-800 Hz, the range of structurally damaging vibration for our applications. If I exclude the 0-10 Hz vibration range of measured data on the shaker then vibration signal is actually less for tamping concrete than for tamping soft grass.
In the field these tampers fail quickly when tamping very hard surfaces. During operation you can feel the machine violently jumping around. Problem is when you look at the spectrum you get alot of gross acceleration (at 0-5Hz) of the device bouncing around.
The makers of the shaker controller recommend not running in the 0-10 Hz range due to control issues, the natural frequencies of the table are in the 2-5 Hz region.
I prefer to accelerate the shaker tests by amplifying the whole PSD curve, and from that I feel I can make more accurate field life estimates. But in these cases if I can replicate the very low frequency vibr., which is dominant in terms of device damge, the field life perdiction is not very accurate.
I was wondering whether any body has come across this issue before and come up with a novel workaround. Thanks in advance for any help and thanks for reading the very long post.
Regards,
George V.
Briggs & Stratton
I have a tamper application that experiences very high amplitude, very low frequency vibration (e.g. 20g @ 0-3 Hz) when tamping a hard surface. Normally to reproduce field data on the shaker I exclude the 0-10 Hz vibration data and run 10-800 Hz, the range of structurally damaging vibration for our applications. If I exclude the 0-10 Hz vibration range of measured data on the shaker then vibration signal is actually less for tamping concrete than for tamping soft grass.
In the field these tampers fail quickly when tamping very hard surfaces. During operation you can feel the machine violently jumping around. Problem is when you look at the spectrum you get alot of gross acceleration (at 0-5Hz) of the device bouncing around.
The makers of the shaker controller recommend not running in the 0-10 Hz range due to control issues, the natural frequencies of the table are in the 2-5 Hz region.
I prefer to accelerate the shaker tests by amplifying the whole PSD curve, and from that I feel I can make more accurate field life estimates. But in these cases if I can replicate the very low frequency vibr., which is dominant in terms of device damge, the field life perdiction is not very accurate.
I was wondering whether any body has come across this issue before and come up with a novel workaround. Thanks in advance for any help and thanks for reading the very long post.
Regards,
George V.
Briggs & Stratton