Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

IBC Impact Loads (Machinery)

Status
Not open for further replies.

StrucPEng

Structural
Apr 23, 2018
95
This may be a very straight forward question but I want to make sure I am designing for the correct loading one of recent projects. I have a piece of machinery that requires new supports. I have the raw weight of the machine and I am looking to obtain the factored load to design to. I see that the IBC (I am using 2015) 1607.9.2 Notes a 50% increase for reciprocating machinery (which is the case in my situation). I want to make sure that the intention of this is to take the raw weight say 5,000 lbs and increase it by 1.5X = 7,500 lbs, then use that amplified weight in the load combinations to land on a factored design load. Basically my question boils down to the provision for impact loads (1607.9.2) is a factor that is used in tandem with the traditional load combination factors not one that is use in replacement of the load combinations.

Additionally, I assume a piece of machinery which is stationary in its position but has a motion to it (hence the reciprocating machinery factor) would be treated as a live load when applying the load combinations (1.6L).

Thanks for everyones help!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Reciprocating (anchored) machinery isn't my idea of the applicable situation for a impact factor. Impact loads are more of a short duration situation. The impact factor probably wouldn't hurt.....but you could get a lot better idea of the transmitted force from a dynamic analysis. (If it is required.)

I'd treat the machine weight as dead load.
 
Thanks for the reply WARose. I should maybe clarify a bit. This machine has a motor driven section that is extended and retracted periodically. This happens maybe 20-25 times in the course of a day, so that was my reasoning for adding the impact load factor as it is not a constant occurrence. I wanted to be covered if (and when)the machine stroke were to max out and abruptly stop.

 
That makes a bit more sense. (Although "periodically" (in my mind) isn't 20-25 times day. [smile])

I get that you want to be covered for this.....but you may have to dig a bit more to be certain of that. I'd contact the manufacturer to know what kind of load is generated when the "machine stroke....max[es]" out. The impact factors in the code won't cover you for all situations (as impact factors can certainly be greater than 50%).

 
I think that is a good idea, I will reach out and see if I can get some more specific loading information from the manufacturer. Thanks for your help!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor