dirtsqueezer
Geotechnical
- Jan 29, 2002
- 269
I have a sort of easy question. If compaction requirements are met, is it important to an engineer that the moisture also be within range of the optimum?
I have inspected projects where the contract documents read, "...fill shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content and be placed to 95% of theoretical maximum...". For say, a clean building sand, if you look at the proctor data, the maximum density can easily be achieved up to 5% over or under the optimum. Not that I recommend using clean SP for structural fill, but just how important is moisture at time of placement? It seems to me if compaction was met, and then a rainstorm came through and saturated the fill, you'd have the same situation as if it were placed out of the specified 'range'. Just curious how the engineers see it.
I have inspected projects where the contract documents read, "...fill shall be within 3% of optimum moisture content and be placed to 95% of theoretical maximum...". For say, a clean building sand, if you look at the proctor data, the maximum density can easily be achieved up to 5% over or under the optimum. Not that I recommend using clean SP for structural fill, but just how important is moisture at time of placement? It seems to me if compaction was met, and then a rainstorm came through and saturated the fill, you'd have the same situation as if it were placed out of the specified 'range'. Just curious how the engineers see it.