There_Will_Be_Mud
Mechanical
- Aug 10, 2023
- 2
Hello all,
I have a vessel I am working on made of 16" sch 140 106C pipe. MDMT is -20°F. Without impact testing I am only good to about 16°F so I will have to do the impact testing. We will have 11 of these vessels which results in quite a bit of pipe and I would rather not switch to 333 GR6 because the cost difference is pretty substantial.
My question is: Compress is allowing me to get away with impact testing at 5°F and then taking a further reduction of 26°F per UCS-66.1. This puts me at MDMT of -21°F so all good. However, UG-84(b)(2) says "unless permitted by table UG-84.4, impact test temperature shall not be warmer the than the minimum design metal temperature". Since I have a yield stress of 40,000 psi I should be able to test 10°F warmer than my MDMT per table UG-84.4 meaning I could do my impact testing at -10°F, but still a far cry from the +5°F that compress is letting me get away with.
Am I missing something here?
Thanks!
I have a vessel I am working on made of 16" sch 140 106C pipe. MDMT is -20°F. Without impact testing I am only good to about 16°F so I will have to do the impact testing. We will have 11 of these vessels which results in quite a bit of pipe and I would rather not switch to 333 GR6 because the cost difference is pretty substantial.
My question is: Compress is allowing me to get away with impact testing at 5°F and then taking a further reduction of 26°F per UCS-66.1. This puts me at MDMT of -21°F so all good. However, UG-84(b)(2) says "unless permitted by table UG-84.4, impact test temperature shall not be warmer the than the minimum design metal temperature". Since I have a yield stress of 40,000 psi I should be able to test 10°F warmer than my MDMT per table UG-84.4 meaning I could do my impact testing at -10°F, but still a far cry from the +5°F that compress is letting me get away with.
Am I missing something here?
Thanks!