MillR
Structural
- Jan 15, 2007
- 67
USGS has published 1 year seismic hazards for 2016, 2017, and 2018 for the increase in earthquake activity in the central part of the United States (Oklahoma), linked to wastewater from mining. The earthquakes are low magnitude, but do cause damage as the infrastructure is not designed for earthquakes. The 2018 hazards have dropped from the 2016 levels as other measures were put into place to reduce the activity. But the hazard is still higher than ASCE 7-10 or ASCE 7-16 tell us to design for. The reasons for this are complicated but come down to the speed at which changes in seismic activity happen and the life cycle of codes.
So this is my question - as design professionals, what, if anything, should we do differently while designing new buildings in these areas? Adopt small changes that have long been accepted in California? Assume that in the life cycle of the building the motions will have stopped or maybe increased? Should code officials address induced seismicity?
So this is my question - as design professionals, what, if anything, should we do differently while designing new buildings in these areas? Adopt small changes that have long been accepted in California? Assume that in the life cycle of the building the motions will have stopped or maybe increased? Should code officials address induced seismicity?