rlewistx
Structural
- Jun 21, 2003
- 98
I have a client who really does not want any visible cracks in his floor as he wants a 'show-room' floor. I am considering post tensioning it and want to get some feedback on others who may have done is for slab on ground crack control. The slab area is approximately 95 feet x 75 feet. 3 sides of the slab perimeter will be exterior wall and one side will abut a slab that continues into office area where I do not have to concern with slab cracking. I will put an expansion joint between the post-tensioned and conventional slab. I will be using a 6" thick concrete slab.
Here is my list of questions:
1. Is this a viable solution for crack control? I recall reading in the past that post tensioning was a good method of crack control, but I have also seen post tension slabs crack, even some large cracks. Post tensioning is not required for expansive soil.
2. When I design post tension slab for expansive soils I limit my interior ribs to 15'-0". Since this is not for a structural foundation, should/could the rib spacing be increased. I'm considering the influence of ribs on the intent of design. Ribs are anchor points in the soil and the more ribs I have, the more anchor points I have. Anchor points resist slab movement so will this negate the closing affect of the post tensioning? I think I need ribs for stiffness, I wouldn't want the slab to buckle under the post tension force. Are ribs detrimental to the whole idea of trying to squeeze the slab back together to limit cracking?
3. The project is in Texas. The 3 sides of the exterior are going to be turned down slab grade beams, typical construction. The most economical way to pour this is to pour the grade beams monolithic with the slab. Perimeter grade beams are anchor point. Seems the same issue as #2 above.
4. How does weather affect this idea? I'm expecting it to be poured in late August, which is still very hot in Texas. The project is out in a wide open lot.
My current intensions is to put a 50% pull on the tendons about 24 hours after pouring concrete. The remaining pull will be made 7-10 days later, after sufficient strength is achieved.
I would appreciate any insight into using this method. I'm also considering using shrinkage compensating concrete as another option. Type K cement is not available in this area, but I have seen some information for an admixture form CTS Cement that purports to turn regular concrete into shrinkage compensating concrete. Has anyone had experience with this product?
Thanks for any assistance you may give.
Rich
Here is my list of questions:
1. Is this a viable solution for crack control? I recall reading in the past that post tensioning was a good method of crack control, but I have also seen post tension slabs crack, even some large cracks. Post tensioning is not required for expansive soil.
2. When I design post tension slab for expansive soils I limit my interior ribs to 15'-0". Since this is not for a structural foundation, should/could the rib spacing be increased. I'm considering the influence of ribs on the intent of design. Ribs are anchor points in the soil and the more ribs I have, the more anchor points I have. Anchor points resist slab movement so will this negate the closing affect of the post tensioning? I think I need ribs for stiffness, I wouldn't want the slab to buckle under the post tension force. Are ribs detrimental to the whole idea of trying to squeeze the slab back together to limit cracking?
3. The project is in Texas. The 3 sides of the exterior are going to be turned down slab grade beams, typical construction. The most economical way to pour this is to pour the grade beams monolithic with the slab. Perimeter grade beams are anchor point. Seems the same issue as #2 above.
4. How does weather affect this idea? I'm expecting it to be poured in late August, which is still very hot in Texas. The project is out in a wide open lot.
My current intensions is to put a 50% pull on the tendons about 24 hours after pouring concrete. The remaining pull will be made 7-10 days later, after sufficient strength is achieved.
I would appreciate any insight into using this method. I'm also considering using shrinkage compensating concrete as another option. Type K cement is not available in this area, but I have seen some information for an admixture form CTS Cement that purports to turn regular concrete into shrinkage compensating concrete. Has anyone had experience with this product?
Thanks for any assistance you may give.
Rich