Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Inertial Navigation Integration FIlter 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

catalindragosh

Computer
Mar 14, 2011
8
0
0
DK
Hello,
I am trying to create a filter that can integrate inertial measurements with GPS measurements. My inertial sensors are a yaw axis gyro, an odometer, and possibly a 3axis accelerometer.
Could you please help me with some guidance? I have read papers, articles and books on the subject but I am still a little confused.
I consider the acceleration constant, so I have a state vector x=[E N v_E v_N a_E a_N], E and N are the positions in NED coordinate system, v_E and v_N are the speed on each axis, and a is the acceleration on each axis
The measurement vector z is [E_GPS N_GPS E_DR N_DR a_E a_N] where E_GPS and N_GPS are the coordinates obtained from the GPS receiver and E_DR and N_DR are the coordinates obtained from the inertial sensors through dead reckoning, and a is the acceleration obtained from the accelerometer.
F, the transformation matrix is: [1 0 dt 0 (dt^2)/2 0; 0 1 0 dt 0 (dt^2)/2; 0 0 1 0 dt 0; 0 0 0 1 0 dt; 0 0 0 0 0 1];
H, the measurement matrix is: [1 0 0 0 0 0; 0 1 0 0 0 0 ; 1 0 0 0 0 0; 0 1 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 1 0; 0 0 0 0 0 1],
Does it make any sense so far? Should I chose a different state vector?
My problem is that I don't know, for this system how can I determine the process noise covariance and measurement noise covariance.
Can you give me some indications in that direction?
Thank you very much.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

So I should introduce an estimate in the equations the measurement and process noise? Like z=Hx+w (where w is the measurement noise) and x(+)=Fx(-)+v (where v is the process noise)?
 
It's not for school. It's a project i'm trying to do im my spare time. So I'm far from the topic? Can you give me some guidance please, so I can clear some of the confusion?
Im trying to integrate the output from an IMU(3 axis gyro, yaw axis accelerometer and odometer if needed) with GPS.
Where do I go wrong in the system described before?
 
The process noise is added to the state update equation:
x(+)=x(-)F+w (w process noise)
and the measurement noise is added to the measurement equation:
z=Hx+v (v measurement noise)
My question is how to determine the values of v and w?
You determine the values experimentally, analytically or you just assume some value by trial and error?
 
Thx for the help. :)
For a Inertial system with a gyro and an odometer, should I introduce more states then [position velocity acceleration]?
Should I introduce in the state vector also the heading, gyro and odometer bias? and i get a state vector like [position velocity acc heading gyro_bias odo_bias] ?
Or in case I don't introduce the bias from the odometer and gyro, they will be part of the measurement noise, and they only downside is that I cannot correct the sensors?
 
Sorry, I forgot I already asked. The fact that you don't know what to do with heading raised a red flag.

Student postings are not allowed on this site. This site is supposed to be for engineering professionals asking work related questions. Some leeway is allowed for cross-discipline work.

TTFN

FAQ731-376
Chinese prisoner wins Nobel Peace Prize
 
So you don't have to worry about this..I haven't been a student for some time...
I'm asking if the heading needs to be part of the state vector as I saw different approaches that did not use it.
And my experience with Kalman filters doesn't go too far. I have read about it but it's the first time I'm trying to implement sth like this.
So then a better state vector would be: [position speed acceleration heading gyro_bias odometer_byas]
or should i leave out the acceleration?
 
If you have no other attitude information, then why do you have heading and gyro_bias? Seems like you picked a bigger problem that necessary for a first project.

A relatively complete set might be:
3 positions
3 velocities
3 accelerations
3 angle
3 angle rates
3 angle accelerations
same with biases

36 states is not unheard-of


TTFN

FAQ731-376
Chinese prisoner wins Nobel Peace Prize
 
IRstuff said:
36 states is not unheard-of
And how...!

If you're adding in GPS, you'll want:
position
velocity
clock bias
clock drift
wheel speed scale factor (I'm assuming this is vehicle-based)
compass offset

Add all of that into what IRstuff listed and you have a pretty significant-sized matrix. Luckily, a large percentage of the coefficients are zero (with the majority of non-zero coefficients along the diagonal), so the calculations are faster than one would expect from a typical 30-coefficient+ matrix.

Dan - Owner
Footwell%20Animation%20Tiny.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top