Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Intersection

Status
Not open for further replies.

st4r

Mechanical
May 2, 2006
38
example: i'm creating a (part)body by extruding two sketches, and these 2 pads intersect (i can't use limits in that case). is it allowed for them to intersect, to just leave them like that, or in that case i must make one of those extruded elements as a new body, and then use boolean operation->add? or it doesn't matter which way i make it?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Hi st4r,

Your post sort of confused me. The method of each pad in its own partbody and then using the boolean operation of add or assemble which produce the same results is good modeling practice. Especially later when having to modify a complex solid. Additionally, if you want the resulting solid from the 2 profiles, try using the combine function. Select sketch.1 and then sketch.2. This will result in an intersected pad.

Hope this helps.

Chewy3000
 
Thanks Chewy. Actually i was wondering wich way is "more" correct when creating complex solid. If two pads intersect then they are both (also) defined in that same space (where intersection is), although they make 1 body. On the other way by making each pad as 1 body, and then using boolean operation (intersection, now between 2 bodies, still exist), resulting body is "union" of these 2 bodies.
 
st4r- will you need to use 1 of the pads in a downstream operation? I like the flexibility of the boolean methodology.

Regards,
Derek

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor