Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Is 2009 really faster? 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

uGlay

Mechanical
Jan 6, 2006
389
0
0
Just got an email from my VAR stating that 09 is 65% faster than 2008. If this is true I need to install it ASAP.

Anyone using 09 can corroborate this?

SW2008 Office Pro SP3.1
Intel Core 2 Duo CPU
2.2GHz, 2.00GB RAM
QuadroFX 3700
SpacePilot/SpaceNavigator
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

jMirisola: Updating to 2009 is a huge PITA since I have to go through IT, have them remote into my computer, download the files for me. Take a whole day and another 2 days to get everything straightened out. So I am not doing it unless I am HIV positive that it will be worth it.

I am almost fed up with 08. Its such a slow pos, especially in drawings mode. I almost feel like exporting my views to AUTOCAD at this point.

SW2008 Office Pro SP3.1
Intel Core 2 Duo CPU
2.2GHz, 2.00GB RAM
QuadroFX 3700
SpacePilot/SpaceNavigator
 
The only place I really have speed issues with 08 is when first launching the program. I did have some problems on an another workstation where 08 would hang for 10-15 seconds multiple times a day but that seemed to be related to a slowly dieing hard drive.
 
The 65% increase in performance (in some areas) came from the announcement at SW World 08. They provided a side-by-side comparrison of 08 & 09 to illustrate the improvements in performance. 09 was better, hands down on performance.

My VAR rep said she just went to the VAR Rollout and she is raving of performance claims.

So, I hope this isn't hijacking this thread or too off topic, but; I've been performing a simply benchmark of opening an Assembly that I have for a few years now on every release / SP of SW that we install. I open in four different modes, my local C Drive, both normal mode and lightweight, then across our LAN in normal and lightweight. This study has been done with the same assembly file, the same Laptop, connected through the same LAN routing to the same network over the course of the study. I think the clear conclusion of the study is that SW is heading in the right dirrection on performance. Study below: (the numbers on the rh column are all in seconds)

Local Drive Normal Mode
06SP4.1 100.00
06SP5.0 52.00
07SP1.0 65.00
07SP2.0 40.50
07SP3.0 53.00
08SP3.0 15.00

Local Drive Lightweight Mode
06SP4.1 31.00
06SP5.0 26.00
07SP1.0 22.50
07SP2.0 18.00
07SP3.0 22.00
08SP3.0 7.00

LAN Normal Mode
06SP4.1 128.00
06SP5.0 69.00
07SP1.0 66.50
07SP2.0 61.50
07SP3.0 62.00
08SP3.0 26.00

LAN Lightweight Mode
06SP4.1 35.00
06SP5.0 24.00
07SP1.0 28.00
07SP2.0 24.00
07SP3.0 25.00
08SP3.0 14.00


M.B. Price CSWP
Automated Assembly & Test Systems
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top