veritas
Electrical
- Oct 30, 2003
- 467
I have attached a simple SLD of a 22kV generator connected to a transmission network via a 22kV/132kV gen trfr. 22kV side of gen trfr is delta connected and 132kV side is star connected.
Synchronisation to the grid is done at the GCB. Prior to synchronisation, with the GCB open, the section of 22kV network from the trfr to the GCB is unearthed. This is allowed for in the governing standards provided there is a protection system applied to detect an EF on this unearthed network. Thus I have applied neutral voltage displacement (NVD) as is the norm in many power stations here. Along comes the client's new engineering manager and says that it is unsafe. It is not so much what the standard allows but whether it is safe. The hazard of an EF on an unearthed network with only one protection function to detect it is not good enough and so an earthing transformer (ET) with neutral earthing resistor (NER) has to go in. CT in ET neutral to be wired to an EF relay. Even a 2nd backup NVD relay is not good enough says he.
This has ignited a raging debate on the issue and I am very interested to hear the thoughts of others. My thoughts are along the lines of is there really a difference between the two? In the sense that an EF with either scenario will result in a serious hazard. Both are dependent on only one relay function to detect and remove the unsafe condition. Yes, EF's on an unearthed network result in very nasty voltage transients due to the capacitive coupling particularly if there is arcing. However, the section of the network in question is very short (around 30m) and it is normally run earthed at the generator end with the GCB closed. Network will only be unearthed for very short periods of time just prior to synchronisation.
Of course the total fault current will increase by the ET contribution if one is introduced but this is not a show-stopper.
Thanks in advance.
Synchronisation to the grid is done at the GCB. Prior to synchronisation, with the GCB open, the section of 22kV network from the trfr to the GCB is unearthed. This is allowed for in the governing standards provided there is a protection system applied to detect an EF on this unearthed network. Thus I have applied neutral voltage displacement (NVD) as is the norm in many power stations here. Along comes the client's new engineering manager and says that it is unsafe. It is not so much what the standard allows but whether it is safe. The hazard of an EF on an unearthed network with only one protection function to detect it is not good enough and so an earthing transformer (ET) with neutral earthing resistor (NER) has to go in. CT in ET neutral to be wired to an EF relay. Even a 2nd backup NVD relay is not good enough says he.
This has ignited a raging debate on the issue and I am very interested to hear the thoughts of others. My thoughts are along the lines of is there really a difference between the two? In the sense that an EF with either scenario will result in a serious hazard. Both are dependent on only one relay function to detect and remove the unsafe condition. Yes, EF's on an unearthed network result in very nasty voltage transients due to the capacitive coupling particularly if there is arcing. However, the section of the network in question is very short (around 30m) and it is normally run earthed at the generator end with the GCB closed. Network will only be unearthed for very short periods of time just prior to synchronisation.
Of course the total fault current will increase by the ET contribution if one is introduced but this is not a show-stopper.
Thanks in advance.