Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Isolation Valves on Breather Vents for Tanks

Status
Not open for further replies.

RJB32482

Chemical
Jan 19, 2005
271
I have looked in the API standards and did not see any problen with adding an isolation valve on breather vents for atmospheric tanks. Is there any other standards that prohibit this. Our maintenance wants to add one for a LOTO while unplugging the line from the tank to our end use.

Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RJB32482:

I presume you are refering to API 2000 Recommended Practice. Note that this is not an API "Standard" (& much less a "code"). Since it is merely a recommendation, you can take it or leave it. I also presume you are referring to (also called) conservation vents that are built to furnish both pressure and vacuum relief on storage tanks. These devices will normally be 2-14" in nominal inlet size (depending on your size of tank) and will, consequently, require at least a full-bore opening block valve. I believe that besides being an expensive enterprise, you can easily find that you are handling some heavy and bulky valves in sizes above 6", making the operation very cumbersome and impractical. Depending on the type and quality of the vapors in your tank(s), you may be able to get by with a thin metal, spectacle blind type of closure. I've used this technique where benign vapor - such as blanket Nitrogen - are involved.

The only thing that could "prohibit" you from doing this would be local ordinances or regulations. I know of no national or state laws that cover this subject.

 
Not all API documents related to relief systems are standards but the 5th edition, April 1998 is actually titled API Standard 2000. Further information about why this document is titled as a standard and what that means can be found in the Special Notes section in the front of the document.

Certainly you need to be clear about what type of vessel and relief device to which you are referring but if API 2000 applies, there is a section (4.5.2 Installation of Pressure and Vacuum Relief Devices) that addresses block valves installed between the tank and the pressure or vacuum relief device.

As far as whether there are other standards that might prohibit the use of block valves, I have known some companies' standards that do not allow the use of block valves except for the 3way type. So as Montemayor indicates, you need to check any local requirements.

In regards to atmospheric or low pressure storage tanks, I would caution you that you have very little room for error due to the low pressure rating of those tanks and you should thoroughly consider the risks versus the benefits of providing isolation for the tank relief device. To impress a point, I have known tanks to have been taken out of service, their vacuum relief valves removed for servicing and the nozzle to be covered with plastic sheeting to prevent anything from getting into the tank. No thicker than what the plastic sheeting was, it was sufficiently strong enough to result in damage to the tank as it went to an inbreathing condition.

Now having taken a second look at your post, I have concerns about what you seem to imply. Does LOTO refer to Lock Out / Tag Out? Why would you want to isolate the tank's relief device when trying to unplug a line between the tank and the end user?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor