Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

IT system single phase breaking capacity 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

pisimatza

Electrical
Nov 30, 2007
41
Hi

IT systems are systems conected to earth through an impedance. To lower short circuit curent, right ?

I have a situation, 380 V, 50 HZ, transformer 2MVA, where i have to choose circuit breakers for an IT system, and in CB catalog , the values for "single phase breaking capacity Iit " are very low: 6, 12, 20 kA. Or max 36 kA for "strongest" MCCBs with Icw = 150 kA for 1 s. The required "short time current" is 50KA /0,5 s.
1. Are those MCCB-s suitable, or low single phase breaking capacity makes then un-usable?
2. Aditional question: in attached diagram 10 A is the maximum short circuit current value, limited with the impedance(resistance)?
3. Then why they(engineers) ask 50kA?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Phase-phase and 3-phase fault currents are not limited by the grounding resistor.
 
You are right, you answered to no. 3, (and 2).
So that means MCCB-s with lower single phase breaking capacity in IT systems are good? In IEC 60947-2 tests for single phase breaking capacity in IT systems are described : "A short-circuit test on the individual poles of the multi-pole circuit breaker".
I still cannot understand this: a robust CB with Icu= 150KA/1 s, in IT has the " single phase breaking capacity in IT" only 25 KA ? This means that: The CB can take 150 KA, but in IT, the same CB can take only 25, under same voltage.
Enlight me, please ...
 
Sorry, I'm not conversant in IEC, someone else will have to explain.
 
This isn't an IEC-only issue, it seems to apply to both IEC types and the odd UL breaker we see over here. Maybe it's a universal problem inherent in MCCB designs. Cooper Bussmann have some discussion in this link, obviously a little biased toward using their fuses to back up the MCCBs:



----------------------------------
image.php

If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 
Thanks ScottyUK, -nice explosion, you must be right, single phase fault probably are more harmfull to MCCB, due to their design.
So-in IT case , when first ph-gnd fault occures, current path is through resistor, current is < 10A. 2-nd ph-gnd fault if occurs, on a different phase, then fault current return path is not through the resistor, and current value can be up to 87% of 3p fault current, and voltage is phase to phase voltage.
Am i right that the fault current after second fault is 2p fault current?


Back to my case... if designer does not give a certain value
of maximum 2 phase short circuit current , i cannot choose the right MCCB.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor