fpssdave
Mechanical
- Jun 2, 2016
- 4
Quick question to get a feel for how this issue is addressed elsewhere:
Our job as an inspection provider is to do ITM as per NFPA 25 and provide a report. It is not:
* Having to explain to belligerent tenants what we are doing and why,
* Having to deal with the site of naked passed out tenants,
* Having to fiddle with a dozen sets of keys (twice for finicky locks) to gain access,
* Having to deal with dogs, cats, snakes, spiders, lizards, and other assorted pets,
* Having to deal with finding hard drugs on the coffee table and closed bedroom doors down the hallway,
* Having to deal with finding a lone baby seemingly abandoned in a suite,
* etc., etc., ad nauseum.
I spoke with others and it's all over the map, but essentially a lot of inspections don't actually appear to ever get properly done. Owners have inspections completed, get sent reports with a blurb (absolving the contractor of liability) to the effect that access to certain suites was not available, and that's the end of it till the following year.
If a complete inspection, done the way it's supposed to be, was like a paint job on a car, my guess is there would be an awful lot of vehicles driving around with primer showing. Yes it's the owners car and he's responsible for it in the end. But the job is not done. I'm not overly OCD, but this kind of thing rubs me the wrong way.
Thoughts?
Our job as an inspection provider is to do ITM as per NFPA 25 and provide a report. It is not:
* Having to explain to belligerent tenants what we are doing and why,
* Having to deal with the site of naked passed out tenants,
* Having to fiddle with a dozen sets of keys (twice for finicky locks) to gain access,
* Having to deal with dogs, cats, snakes, spiders, lizards, and other assorted pets,
* Having to deal with finding hard drugs on the coffee table and closed bedroom doors down the hallway,
* Having to deal with finding a lone baby seemingly abandoned in a suite,
* etc., etc., ad nauseum.
I spoke with others and it's all over the map, but essentially a lot of inspections don't actually appear to ever get properly done. Owners have inspections completed, get sent reports with a blurb (absolving the contractor of liability) to the effect that access to certain suites was not available, and that's the end of it till the following year.
If a complete inspection, done the way it's supposed to be, was like a paint job on a car, my guess is there would be an awful lot of vehicles driving around with primer showing. Yes it's the owners car and he's responsible for it in the end. But the job is not done. I'm not overly OCD, but this kind of thing rubs me the wrong way.
Thoughts?