K=1.0 for all column types buckling design under Direct Analysis Method? 1

[SuG89]

Hello,

In AISC 13th Edition, Table C-C2.2 on page 16.1-240 gives the approximate values of effective length factor, K. I could not find such a table in AISC 14th Edition. I assume this is because the 14th Edition recommends to use the Direct Analysis Method in which the K value for all members can be taken as 1.0.

As an example problem, if I have a massive free-standing steel column with a podium on top, is it safe to use K=1.0 for the buckling check instead of theoretical K=2.0 or recommended K=2.10?

Thanks,
Su

 

[straub46]

The table moved to the Commentary of Appendix 7. Table C-A-7.1 I believe is what you're looking for.

Go Bucks!

 

[Lomarandil]

Yes, if you use all the provisions of the Direct Analysis method -- K=1.0 is correct, and safe.

Depending on the proportions of your column and podium, the old "effective length method" may not even be applicable.

----
The name is a long story -- just call me Lo.

 

[SuG89]

Thanks to both of you for the responses!