Engrman
Structural
- Apr 2, 2002
- 54
The local bldg dept inspector told the contractor for one of my condo projects that the pre-engineered wood roof trusses couldn't penetrate the sheetrock and bear on a two hour wood stud fire wall even though plan checker approved the architect's detail of it. The contractor decided, unbeknownst to me and with the help of the truss supplier, to support the trusses (1530# total end reaction, trusses spaced at 24" o.c.) on a 2x8 ledger lag screwed thru the sheetrock into the wall studs (two 1/2" lags ea. stud, studs spaced at 16'' o.c.). Now the inspector of course says he needs a stamped letter approving the change. Several things about this that're bugging me:
1. Since they didn't bother to include me in on this I figure the truss supplier's engineer should provide the stamp and accept the liability. They say it's my problem. The inspector, the @#$*&%$, agrees and wants a letter from me. Any suggestions?
2. I have no way of verifying the quality of the lag screw installation. The NDS says minimum edge distance on lags, load parallel to grain, is 1.5D, which means they have to be dead bang on each one in the studs. Also, I think the NDS requirements were based on lags penetrating the wide face of each element, not the narrow. Opinions?
3. My opinion is that the 2 hour wall's 2 layers of 5/8" rock doesn't provide any support to the lags and that places them in bending, moment arm of 1-1/4" + the ledger thickness. Yes, no? Right, wrong?
4. The NDS says lag screws shall conform to ANSI/ASME B18.2.1-1981. ASME's web site says that standard is for large rivets. What are the properties of the steel lag screws are made of? The lag screws you get at Home Depot are pretty brittle. I've torqued the heads off of smaller diameter ones with just a small rachet. I don't like the possibility of brittle failure here. Am I being to old womanish?
5. The NDS lag screw values are based on shear thru the shank not the threads. If the assumption that the sheetrock provides no support is correct, then the shear is now thru the threads. Do I just reduce the NDS table values by the ratio of the root diameter to the shank's?
1. Since they didn't bother to include me in on this I figure the truss supplier's engineer should provide the stamp and accept the liability. They say it's my problem. The inspector, the @#$*&%$, agrees and wants a letter from me. Any suggestions?
2. I have no way of verifying the quality of the lag screw installation. The NDS says minimum edge distance on lags, load parallel to grain, is 1.5D, which means they have to be dead bang on each one in the studs. Also, I think the NDS requirements were based on lags penetrating the wide face of each element, not the narrow. Opinions?
3. My opinion is that the 2 hour wall's 2 layers of 5/8" rock doesn't provide any support to the lags and that places them in bending, moment arm of 1-1/4" + the ledger thickness. Yes, no? Right, wrong?
4. The NDS says lag screws shall conform to ANSI/ASME B18.2.1-1981. ASME's web site says that standard is for large rivets. What are the properties of the steel lag screws are made of? The lag screws you get at Home Depot are pretty brittle. I've torqued the heads off of smaller diameter ones with just a small rachet. I don't like the possibility of brittle failure here. Am I being to old womanish?
5. The NDS lag screw values are based on shear thru the shank not the threads. If the assumption that the sheetrock provides no support is correct, then the shear is now thru the threads. Do I just reduce the NDS table values by the ratio of the root diameter to the shank's?