andyenergy
Materials
- Feb 20, 2003
- 124
I'd like some views from some of the experts on this forum if possible.
Bearing in mind I'm just about to go on holiday for a couple of weeks, I won't be able to respond to any queries you may have but I'd like to gather opinion in the first instance.
I have been seeing a possible increase in leaks developing in seal welds over the past couple of years. I have no statistics or data to back this up but simply observations of the number of times that I've been called on this topic.
These can happen in a variety of materials, but typically are in carbon steels or stainless and are in such geometries as tube to tube plate seal welds, plugs that are inserted in tubes to blank heat exchanger paths. These tube blanks usually consist of a solid prepared plug insterted in the bore of a tube that is typically of the order of 19 mm OD with a wall thickness of 3 mm maximum.
These welds may be one or two pass TIG (GTAW) welds and the leak usuaully manifests itself as a pinhole leak. The geometery and access is usually such that investigation of the root cause is difficult if not impossible although some rectification has revealed sub surface pores that are bigger than the leak site or exit hole.
In some cases, seal welds have been successfully surface inspected with recordable defects although again, access limitations often dictate that the surfaces are as-welded which has an obvious limitation in terms of the size of defects that can be detetcted. In addition, low pressure testing confirms the freedom from through weld defects but leaks develop either in service or as result of high pressure boiler filling (at a much higher presure than the original leak detection phase).
I belive that there are at least a couple of contributory factors - cleanliness of the joint and access. Both of these may produce conditions whereby a seal weld may look OK on the surface and resist a low pressure leak test but may contain sub surface defects that have a small remaining ligament which would fail a high pressure test.
In addition, thermal or pressure cycling can cause these ligaments to fail in time. Our applications are generally limited to very few cycles of either pressure or temperature. Temperature ranges are quite low and are associated with feed or economiser temperatures (100 - 200C. Other failures I have seen may have been in low alloy materials where creep may have also contributed but the root cause of sub surface defects is likely to be the same.
I would be very intertested in any feedback from others who may have encountered similar issues and any published information or operational experience on any testing that may have taken place. Feedback on my thoughts of the likely mechanisms would be gratefully received.
As I will not be around for a couple of weeks, I look forward to any responses when I return.
Thanks for your time.
Andy
Bearing in mind I'm just about to go on holiday for a couple of weeks, I won't be able to respond to any queries you may have but I'd like to gather opinion in the first instance.
I have been seeing a possible increase in leaks developing in seal welds over the past couple of years. I have no statistics or data to back this up but simply observations of the number of times that I've been called on this topic.
These can happen in a variety of materials, but typically are in carbon steels or stainless and are in such geometries as tube to tube plate seal welds, plugs that are inserted in tubes to blank heat exchanger paths. These tube blanks usually consist of a solid prepared plug insterted in the bore of a tube that is typically of the order of 19 mm OD with a wall thickness of 3 mm maximum.
These welds may be one or two pass TIG (GTAW) welds and the leak usuaully manifests itself as a pinhole leak. The geometery and access is usually such that investigation of the root cause is difficult if not impossible although some rectification has revealed sub surface pores that are bigger than the leak site or exit hole.
In some cases, seal welds have been successfully surface inspected with recordable defects although again, access limitations often dictate that the surfaces are as-welded which has an obvious limitation in terms of the size of defects that can be detetcted. In addition, low pressure testing confirms the freedom from through weld defects but leaks develop either in service or as result of high pressure boiler filling (at a much higher presure than the original leak detection phase).
I belive that there are at least a couple of contributory factors - cleanliness of the joint and access. Both of these may produce conditions whereby a seal weld may look OK on the surface and resist a low pressure leak test but may contain sub surface defects that have a small remaining ligament which would fail a high pressure test.
In addition, thermal or pressure cycling can cause these ligaments to fail in time. Our applications are generally limited to very few cycles of either pressure or temperature. Temperature ranges are quite low and are associated with feed or economiser temperatures (100 - 200C. Other failures I have seen may have been in low alloy materials where creep may have also contributed but the root cause of sub surface defects is likely to be the same.
I would be very intertested in any feedback from others who may have encountered similar issues and any published information or operational experience on any testing that may have taken place. Feedback on my thoughts of the likely mechanisms would be gratefully received.
As I will not be around for a couple of weeks, I look forward to any responses when I return.
Thanks for your time.
Andy