Mateus_R
Mechanical
- Mar 15, 2018
- 48
Hi everyone.
To perform a lifting analysis of an equipment using Ansys Mechanical, I know two different approaches and I would like your opinion about them:
1) I simulate the cables that will lift the structure as spring elements (body-reference), including the axial stiffness of the designed cable that will be used in this operation. If I have a 4 lifting set, I connect the body side of the spring in the lifting padeye and the reference side of the spring where the masterlink/cranehook is located (considering the design angles).
In my opinion, this approach provides a good understanding about the real operation, but a problem arise when I want to understand the elastic deformations that the structure suffer. Since my "spring cables" can deform, I can't exclude this effect of the simulation and I can't evaluate only the deformations of the structure.
Anyone knows how to exclude the cable deformation effect?
2) Simulate the lifting condition using remote points. In this case I can create a local coordinate system where the masterlink/cranehook is located and attach a Remote Point on it. I'll constrain the model using a remote displacement, selecting the holes of the lifting padeyes as geometry and defining the local coordinate system where the remote point is attached. Later on I can set as free the rotations, limit the translations...
I'm not familiar with the use of Remote Points and how they'll affect the model (I imagine they can affect the stiffness of the elements) and the results. In this case, I can observe only the deformation on the structure and it solves my problem.
What do you think about these 2 approaches? Any pro/cons about them?
Thank you in advance.
To perform a lifting analysis of an equipment using Ansys Mechanical, I know two different approaches and I would like your opinion about them:
1) I simulate the cables that will lift the structure as spring elements (body-reference), including the axial stiffness of the designed cable that will be used in this operation. If I have a 4 lifting set, I connect the body side of the spring in the lifting padeye and the reference side of the spring where the masterlink/cranehook is located (considering the design angles).
In my opinion, this approach provides a good understanding about the real operation, but a problem arise when I want to understand the elastic deformations that the structure suffer. Since my "spring cables" can deform, I can't exclude this effect of the simulation and I can't evaluate only the deformations of the structure.
Anyone knows how to exclude the cable deformation effect?
2) Simulate the lifting condition using remote points. In this case I can create a local coordinate system where the masterlink/cranehook is located and attach a Remote Point on it. I'll constrain the model using a remote displacement, selecting the holes of the lifting padeyes as geometry and defining the local coordinate system where the remote point is attached. Later on I can set as free the rotations, limit the translations...
I'm not familiar with the use of Remote Points and how they'll affect the model (I imagine they can affect the stiffness of the elements) and the results. In this case, I can observe only the deformation on the structure and it solves my problem.
What do you think about these 2 approaches? Any pro/cons about them?
Thank you in advance.