Orange44
Structural
- Apr 23, 2007
- 1
This is in reference to a medical building where the construction is 3.5" lightweight concrete (f'c=4000 psi) on 2" metal deck.
It has recently come to our attention that some manufacturers of rubber flooring will not warrant their product if it is installed over concrete that is less than 115 pcf (regardless of moisture content). This has our client worried, that they will not be able to install their desired flooring because of the type of concrete that is specified for our project.
The intent of this warranty language is probably in reference to poor mixes, underlayment such as Gyp-crete, or fillers; not properly mixed lightweight concrete. Because the warranty language states 115 pcf as a cut-off, though, we’ve been informed that it has been used to excuse flooring deficiencies on any lightweight mix that is poured at anything less than specified, even if it’s 114 pcf (which is within tolerance for lightweight concrete).
Is this an issue which has been brought to your attention for any other projects? If so, is there a remedy, such as particular specification language, that is acceptable to concrete manufacturers as well as flooring manufacturers?
Thanks for any help.
It has recently come to our attention that some manufacturers of rubber flooring will not warrant their product if it is installed over concrete that is less than 115 pcf (regardless of moisture content). This has our client worried, that they will not be able to install their desired flooring because of the type of concrete that is specified for our project.
The intent of this warranty language is probably in reference to poor mixes, underlayment such as Gyp-crete, or fillers; not properly mixed lightweight concrete. Because the warranty language states 115 pcf as a cut-off, though, we’ve been informed that it has been used to excuse flooring deficiencies on any lightweight mix that is poured at anything less than specified, even if it’s 114 pcf (which is within tolerance for lightweight concrete).
Is this an issue which has been brought to your attention for any other projects? If so, is there a remedy, such as particular specification language, that is acceptable to concrete manufacturers as well as flooring manufacturers?
Thanks for any help.