Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Line stop support in High pressure high temperature steam pipe

Status
Not open for further replies.

pepeuy

Mechanical
Jul 20, 2008
14
0
0
UY
Hi everybody,

I've asked some questions regarding steam turbine nozzle strengths and your replies were very useful.

I now have to design a line stop for a SA335-P22 8" NPS that runs 65 barg steam at 530ºC.

Some engineers around say that a we can't use a guide (IPN type welded to the pipe) due to stress concentration. I however believe that if we can build an IPN type guide with maximum displacements stops (in the appropriate material for high T) the line stop can be used.

What do you think?

Thanks in advance
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

BigInch, i don't really get your reply.

BTW there must be, perhaps a couple of engineers that have worked with this steam conditions in Uruguay and for sure they never used FEA to work them out.

And they aren't the ones around me.

In Vino Veritas
 
I mean its hard to say exactly what you can or can't use for a stop when you supply no configuration, no forces, no wall thickness, no nothing, except material, pressure and temperature. If you were asking if the material was OK, that would have been a more or less valid question.

**********************
"The problem isn't finding the solution, its trying to get to the real question." BigInch
 
I am more than a little concerned...

"SA335-P22 8" NPS that runs 65 barg steam at 530ºC."

Not the kind of system for a novice to be learning & discovering piping design.

Hope that you have Schedule 80 or thicker piping....

What wall thickness do you have ?

-MJC





 
MJCronin, as you well say i'm a novice learning with this pipe :S

I have selected a Sch. 120 and the many (more than 1000) runs with autopipe confirm that the pipe complies with B31.1, if the supports are well fabricated.

The only messy point is that the stresses on the turbine nozzle are over (less than 50%) the ones that the manufacturer has informed.

I had accomplished the stresses before, but due to civil construction i had to modify the layout and the stresses went up again. At this point i don't really care anymore since this pipe has been around well over 12 months.

I know it's unethical to do this, but nobody else cares about the pipe flexibility and turbine nozzle stresses rather than me. It's like if i'm surrounded by insane people. And i'm really tired of looking for solutions running in circles, with no good ideas coming from anyone else.

In Vino Veritas
 
Why you are not using the expansion joint to reduce the stresses as i belive most of the stresses are due to expansion at high temperature.

thanks
 
@Kentech394: If you know any company that manufactures expansion joints for that operating point please let me know, I couldn't find any.



In Vino Veritas
 
I guess you can weld shear keys (which thermal gradients can be kept as low as possible through keeping the height of the keys) on to the pipe (horizontal or vertical) and take the load by a riser clamp. Keys, depending on the load direction(s), can be on both side of the riser clamp and welded with complete penetration. Key face against the clamp should be kept flat. Key numbers can be determined by the allowable bearing pressure at the design temperature, and the lengths can be determined by the allowable shear stress with some margin in accordance with the applicable code. Firs you need to select the riser clamp from a reputable supplier.

This is very common application, however increasing the height of the key will increase the thermal gradient, and thermal stresses. So you need to use the required height (check the thickness of the riser clamp plate) only to keep it minimum. I have not seen anyone doing any FEA and fatigue analysis on this application, it is well proven common application. But I would like to hear if there is an available proof analysis for this application.

Hope it helps.

Ibrahim Demir
 
My comment above was for the line stop in axial direction of the pipe.

In case you want to stop lateral movement of the pipe you still can use plate welded onto the pipe, facing a structural member, but you need to reduce the thermal gradient and thermal stresses by introducing thermal barriers . If you do not know what you are doing it can be very risky application.

If the loads are very large, I guess you should not stop the pipe moving sideway. Common approach is not to use weld integral supports onto the pipe to eliminate/reduce all the local thermal/mechanical stresses.

Ibrahim Demir
 
@unclesyd: I have consider cold spring, but the forces that are over the limits are the ones perpendicular to the flange and not in axial direction.

In Vino Veritas
 
pepeuy,
Surely all of your pipework does not run axially to the flange - you must have legs perpendicular to the nozzle orientation where you can apply cold-pull to lower loads!!!
 
I understand from your description that your piping system needs more flexibility to eliminate this kind of problems. Restraining piping under thermal loads will transfer supports excessive loads, and this will increase secondary stresses in the piping.

I suggest you to review the pipe route and supports all together.

Ibrahim Demir
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top