Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Looking for Old Steel Channel Properties - Please Help

Status
Not open for further replies.

sgunn

Structural
Jul 14, 2003
11
I'm trying to find an old book or publication that would have old steel channel properties. I have found a few books/publications that have old steel shape properties, but they typically only have wide flange shapes.

The particular section I'm trying to find is a C8x4.7. This shape is spec'd on a set of plans from '79. The shape is not present in the 6th or 8th Ed's of the AISC steel manuals, but I do not have the 7th Edition to check.

If anyone has access to an old database of channels or if you could point me to the right place I would be extremely grateful.

Thanks,

Steve
sgunn@keelerwebb.com
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

If it is a typo? I have a 8x.487 "web thickness" listed in a old Bethlehem structural shapes book. I this what you mean? I can fax you a copy .... need #

Getgo@bigfoot.com
 

found this with a search looks like the last line CHN81875

CHN885
8
1.875
0.180
8.50
170.00
340.00

CHN8115
8
2.260
0.220
11.50
230.00
460.00

CHN81375
8
2.343
36
PART #
WEB WIDTH 'A'
LEG HEIGHT 'B'
WEB THICKNESS 'C'
WEIGHT PER FOOT
WEIGHT PER 20'
WEIGHT PER 40'

0.303
13.75
275.00
550.00

CHN81875
8
2.527
0.487
18.75
375.00
750.00
 



Structural Channels

Size
LBS/FT
WEB
FLANGE

3
4.1
0.170
1.410

6.0
0.258
1.498

5.4
0.356
1.596

7.3
0.180
1.580

4
6.70
0.320
1.720

9.0
0.190
1.750

5
8.2
0.325
1.885

10.5
0.200
1.920

6
13.0
0.314
2.034

9.8
0.437
2.157

12.3
0.210
2.090

7
14.8
0.314
2.194

11.5
0.419
2.299

13.8
0.220
2.260

8
18.8
0.303
2.343
8888888888888888888888888888
13.4
0.487 Bingoooooooo
2.527
8888888888888888888888888888
15.0
0.230
2.430

9
20.0
0.285
2.485

15.3
0.448
2.648

20.0
0.240
2.600

10

ALSO
 
Thanks for everyone's help. RAY72, thanks for the posts, but I'm afraid the weight per foot doesn't match up with your suggestions. I have also talked to someone at AISC, and they're telling me that it doesn't exist. So, I'm thinking it must be an aluminum shape (even though the plans make no reference to aluminum).

 
It appears that it is just a typo. Notice that the weight does not correspond with the depth. Nothing that a site visit can't clear up.
 
Is there going to be an end to this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor