jtimmer
Mechanical
- Apr 24, 2013
- 17
I have inherited a chilled water system with a unique design that is having problems. The system has four 15 Ton chillers that are water cooled. Each chiller has its own pump; the original design is for 3 chillers and 3 pumps to be online at any one time. The unique aspect to me is that 3 of the chillers are located together at the end of the system and the final chiller is connected in the middle of the system and there is just one single loop with no segregation or zones to it. See the diagram. The problem they are having is that the chiller/pump combination in the middle seems to starve the chillers at the end of the system. When the middle pump is not running the other pumps (even when all 3 are running) have a hard time keeping the system cool.
As I look at the system I believe this is due to a number of factors:
First, the expansion tank is connected at the inlet side of the middle chiller and will have little effect on helping the suction pressure at the back pumps due the distance and pressure losses. The return line goes back to the other chillers first then even father back to the pumps and by that time it seems to me that the expansion tank pressure will not help.
Secondly, the system (as far as I can tell) is designed for 3 chillers and pumps to supply the water needed, however the operating procedure that is currently used appears to be to run all the 4 pumps regardless of which 3 chillers are operating. My analysis of this is: since the flow control devices are constant flow valves and the control valves are 3 way bypass valves at each air handler, if the middle pump is running it can very likely starve the 3 pumps at the end of the system because there is only a set amount of water that will flow, does that make sense. I am not totally sure why the flow rate is not up to what it should be based on the constant flow fittings in the system however.
My question then, aside from getting the operating conditions correct (only run 3 pumps at any one time), what is the best way to correct the suction pressure on the back 3 pumps. I was thinking of adding a pipe off the expansion tank that runs to the common suction header on the back 3 pumps , but wanted to know what the thought is on this, will teeing the expansion tank into two location in the same system have any negative effects? Is there a simple way this could be tested with minimal system intrusion?
Thanks
As I look at the system I believe this is due to a number of factors:
First, the expansion tank is connected at the inlet side of the middle chiller and will have little effect on helping the suction pressure at the back pumps due the distance and pressure losses. The return line goes back to the other chillers first then even father back to the pumps and by that time it seems to me that the expansion tank pressure will not help.
Secondly, the system (as far as I can tell) is designed for 3 chillers and pumps to supply the water needed, however the operating procedure that is currently used appears to be to run all the 4 pumps regardless of which 3 chillers are operating. My analysis of this is: since the flow control devices are constant flow valves and the control valves are 3 way bypass valves at each air handler, if the middle pump is running it can very likely starve the 3 pumps at the end of the system because there is only a set amount of water that will flow, does that make sense. I am not totally sure why the flow rate is not up to what it should be based on the constant flow fittings in the system however.
My question then, aside from getting the operating conditions correct (only run 3 pumps at any one time), what is the best way to correct the suction pressure on the back 3 pumps. I was thinking of adding a pipe off the expansion tank that runs to the common suction header on the back 3 pumps , but wanted to know what the thought is on this, will teeing the expansion tank into two location in the same system have any negative effects? Is there a simple way this could be tested with minimal system intrusion?
Thanks