Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

MathCADÆs solve for variable in the symbolic menu

Status
Not open for further replies.

MURZ

Materials
Jun 23, 2001
20
I am currently working on a project where I am using MathCAD’s solve for variable in the symbolic menu. I have the following

First equation is ?m := 1/n3 where n3 is 11.408 this implies that ?m = 0.0877

I then try to solve for ? in the following equation using the solve for variable in the symbolic menu.
?m = (1/?)exp(-?-?) (For this equal sign I used Ctrl =) when I use the solve for variable I get ?=1/2ln(2/?m) which implies ?=1.564.

However, when I set the equation like this 0.0877 = (1/?)exp(-?-?) and solve for ? I get 1.14793 which is the answer I need.

Why are the two different? How can I get the equation to equal the 1.1479 when I use the variable ?m in the equation. I would eventually like to use the equation

Acm:=(1/?)exp(-?-?)=?m solve,?
Any help would be appreciated

Thanks

Mark M
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I'm confused by the use of the question mark. Is this a variable name? If you type ?, you get a derivative operator.
 
Let's try this. Looks like when I did a cut and past something went wrong.

I have a mathcad sheet if it will help.

I am currently working on a project where I am using MathCAD’s solve for variable in the symbolic menu. I have the following

First equation is Em := 1/n3 where n3 is 11.408 this implies that Em = 0.0877

I then try to solve for E in the following equation using the solve for variable in the symbolic menu.
Em = (1/E)exp(-E-E) (For this equal sign I used Ctrl =) when I use the solve for variable I get E=1/2ln(2/Em) which implies E=1.564.

However, when I set the equation like this 0.0877 = (1/E)exp(-E-E) and solve for E I get 1.14793 which is the answer I need.

Why are the two different? How can I get the equation to equal the 1.1479 when I use the variable ?m in the equation. I would eventually like to use the equation

Acm:=(1/E)exp(-E-E)=Em solve,E
Any help would be appreciated
 


so, if you back substitute E=1/2ln(2/Em) into (1/E)exp(-E-E)
does it make sense?

have you tried plotting the function out to see why there might be a problem?



Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor